It seems that General Gay Keith, the Clinton plant, was not in fact a Brigadier General and ...

Frontpage Magazine Blog ^ | November 30, 2007 | David Horowitz

[Sloth]

And Captain Crunch.

[painter]

Bump.

[WalterSkinner]

[WalterSkinner]

..that eyewitness account is a bombshell

The fact that Anderson Cooper actually knew the "General" is no surprise (I don't need to expand do I?)--and it makes his mea culpa that much more comical...

LINK

[SJSAMPLE]

That’s good to know.
I spent five years active and nine years in the reserves and even though the conversion from combat arms was a pain, there’s still a lot of good people and solid experience.

[KC_Conspirator]

Precisely.

[Bookwoman]

Thank you. I heard that caller. I love this site! When are they going to learn that nothing on the public record can remain hidden for long with freepers on the job - and radio/tv personalities that lurk?

[Sun]

“GAY KEITH IS NOT A BRIGADIER GENERAL. HE IS NOT EVEN AN ACTIVE DUTY RETIRED ARMY OFFICER. HE SPENT HIS YEARS AS A RESERVIST SOLELY IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA MILITARY BUREAUCRACY. HIS BIO IS PUBLISHED IN THE GAY ORGANIZATION DEDICATED TO VOIDING THE “DON’T ASK DON’T TELL” POLICY.”

Whoa!! I will share this with family and friends.

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks.

Hopefully, Rush, Sean and Fox News will pick up this latest bs.

Makes one wonder how many times this maggot and the CNN host were really good buddies.

[Judith Anne]

And all these so called questions were supposedly from “undecided Republicans.”

All those so called questions were just 10 pounds of fertilizer in a 5 pound bag.

[WalterSkinner]

..another blog article on the matter:

News Which Cannot Lose: General Deception--Further Revelations on Hillary's Gay General

[Grampa Dave]

A planted Blivet!

[3D-JOY]

Thanks for the ping and BTTT!

I’ll keep listening for follow-up with RUSH.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

You know, out of pure competitive glee the other networks ought to be beating CNN to a pulp over this. That they are silent indicates just how much is wrong with our "free press" - beating the Republicans and making sure the apparatus of handing out government patronage is returned to Democrat control is more important to liberal-leaning network executives than the health of their own businesses. In their hubris they think they are actually a part of government, and have a responsibility to influence political outcomes.

The same thing was obvious about the CBS "independent investigation" which was constituted for the purpose of not finding that the so-called "Killian memos" are obvious, crude fabrications - and of "learning" that the October 2004 Rather/Mapes political hit piece on George W. Bush "was not politically motivated." A competitive journalism would have been all over that obvious fairy tale like white on rice.

The reason for this phenomenon is addressed (IMHO, explained) in this thread.

[Political Junkie Too]

Last night when O'Reilly had this guy on his show, O'Reilly made a comment that "you're a Brigadier General, you've been around so you know what I'm talking about..."

Kerr said nothing to O'Reilly in response to that statement, and O'Reilly went on to his next point of discussion with the guy.

-PJ

[ABN 505]

If it ain’t about “Bill” His interest level drops down to the zero range.He is what we used to called a self serving BLOW HARD. A Bloviater in his own terminology!

[Enchante]

"I knew it. He spent all of his time in the rear."

I think that's enough nasty sexual innuendo for one day. :^)

[Marine_Uncle]

The problem as you can well surmise, it will be keeped under wraps by most if not all of the L/MSM. Or at most reported on page forty three.

[hdstmf]

Well, he was always an officer that stood behind his troops.

...as he screwed them.

[hdstmf]

Is there something wrong with the being in the Reserves.?

Absolutely not. Only with politically connected members who are pushing their ego driven agendas.