Even the FBI's expanded list is missing four of every five Americans
who have been ruled mentally dangerous to themselves or others.
Even the FBI's expanded list is missing four of every five Americans
who have been ruled mentally dangerous to themselves or others.
“Justice officials said the FBI’s Mental Defective File has ballooned from 175,000 names in June to nearly 400,000, primarily additions from California.
Hmmm......
Backdoor gun control! Just expand the list of those prohibited from gun ownership until virtually no one qualifies.
WTH?
Why wouldn't the FBI check it as part of their instant check system?
Is it so they can use it as a "gotcha" to put the remaining licensed gun dealers out of business?
Yep. Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, John Murtha.................................................................................
Okay - let’s think about this for a second.
If these people cannot be trusted with a firearm - then, why are they out walking around? Surely it follows they should not be allowed in public.
Further, they have undoubtedly had their names stricken from voter rolls, yes? For this is a much more dangerous activity.
And, nobody at the DOT is going to let them drive a car, obviously. I’m sure I’ve left quite a few other areas and concerns out, but you get the idea.
The question remains “what is the source of the names added to the list?”
Now, why should THAT come as a surprise to anyone???
Can we check and see if "Stretch" Pelosi and Barbara Box-o-rocks are on that list?
I can see it now. The willingness to own or bear arms makes you unstable--BY DEFINITION. /s
Didn’t you tell me Eaker appears on the list about a dozen times? :-)
More seriously though, anything and everything will become a reason to say someone is unstable, including wanting a gun.
LOL! Good picture. That woman, Hillary, looks nuttier than a fruit cake.
Every regesitered republican will soon be on that list.
If these people are considered too dangerous for society, shouldn’t we put them all in jail?
I mean, what if they get a hold of a kitchen knife, or a large paid of scissors?
There’s also all sorts of explosives you can get pretty easy, so if we really think these people are just too dangerous to be allowed to have access to a gun, maybe we should take away their driver licenses, at least if they are driving large SUVs. We all know how dangerous they can be.
I certainly don’t want any of these people manning the 911 phone system, because if they are so dangerous they could mess up. Or operating any heavy equipment.
No, I think I was right — we should just put them all in prison, for our protection.
This might not be such a bad thing. We could start with one's political orientation....
Republicans Report Having Better Mental Health Than Democrats, Poll Finds
Fox News ^ | December 1, 2007 | Fox News
Posted on 12/01/2007 5:23:06 PM PST by Luke Skyfreeper
Don't worry, be happy: If you're a Republican, those words should be easy to follow. A roundup of Gallup health polls over the past four years finds that Republicans are far more likely than Democrats to report having excellent mental health. The survey found that 58 percent of Republicans polled reported having excellent mental health. Only 38 percent of Democrats and 43 percent of Independents reported the same
The surge in names underscores the vastness of the gap in FBI records...
If Mrs Clinton is elected or steels the election, anyone who ever criticized her or claimed she is a murderer will be on so many lists they will find it hard to live.
Backed by the f.b.i.
Just a note on grammar: perhaps the number of ineligible people soars or skyrockets, or perhaps the list blossoms or balloons, but no, the list does not soar.
It sounds like some kind of magic carpet document climbing into the sky like a great bird.
bmflr
.
.
.
Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts
Posted on 11/15/2007 3:43:17 AM PST by Kevmo