no actually it wasn’t. As a matter of fact I saw an interview with the leading hollywood costume maker at that time who studied the film and he said, there is no way that is a costume because they didnt have the fake hair that would move and reflect like that at that time. Also he said that the folds of skin and movement were too perfect.
I never bought into any of it until I started reading the reports at BFRO.net and there are first hand eyewitness reports (and newpaper articles)some going back to the 1800’s. I have know Idea what it or they are but there are just too many individuals that have seen these things at different times that report the same consistant things to have it be a coincidence. Many happened before the internet and before the patterson film was even shot. So it would be hard for a bunch of individuals to make up a story of a creature, describing how they look and behave without knowing the other persons descriptions of account.
So I don’t know what it is, I just know I sit back and now go...”hmmmmm” rather than “PPPffff” and dismiss it.
Cool. Honestly, I’d LOVE for there to be a big hairy half-human who walks on two legs and lumbers around North America aimlessly (in addition to Janet Reno of course).
Thanks for the info. I guess I was thinking of the Loch Ness monster photog who confessed on his deathbed that it was all a hoax. I was rooting for that to be true also...