Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
But there was no metamorphis. DNA didn't change in the survivors from pre-test to post-test.

Perhaps I wasn't clear. We're talking about over subsequent generations. To the contrary, the DNA of the gene pool does change over time.

77 posted on 12/02/2007 10:57:12 AM PST by freespirited (I'm voting for the GOP nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: freespirited
How do we know that? And is it meaningful?

Remember, bacteria can and do borrow genes from other bacteria all the time. We don't know if the aggregate genepool for bacteria in the broadest sense ever change.

81 posted on 12/02/2007 11:04:19 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
"Perhaps I wasn't clear. We're talking about over subsequent generations. To the contrary, the DNA of the gene pool does change over time."

Nope. All that happens is that genes with a pre-existing resistance (or ability to borrow said resistance) survive to propagate.

But the bacterial mat hasn't added new genes because of your experiment. It might shift some genes around, but those genes already existed.

No new aggregate data was introduced into the overall DNA.

98 posted on 12/02/2007 12:36:22 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson