[js1138]

"Then why is every prominent ID proponent affiliated with them?"

I'm not. Ergo your premise is flawed

I think one could reasonably define prominent as having written a book that most people interested in the subject have heard of and seen quoted, or having been invited to testify as an expert witness in a relevant court action.

I suppose there are prominent scientists who have done none of these things, but we all know that scientists are fired as soon as they indicate an interest in ID; therefore there cannot be any prominent ID supporters who are successful, practicing scientists.

[Southack]

See #44.