To: LibertarianSchmoe
"I'm not qualified to either make or refute that claim. I can say that our ability to engineer new life forms has no bearing on the validity of the Theory of Evolution or I.D." - LibertarianSchmoe You're contradicting yourself.
If we are engineering new life forms, then ID explains all such new species, scientifically. That means that ID is a valid theory. It conclusively explains something without question.
321 posted on
12/06/2007 8:13:40 AM PST by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
If we are engineering new life forms, then ID explains all such new species, scientifically. Another claim so mind-bendingly stupid that you stand alone.
Is there anyone lurking on this thread who believes that because humans can dig ditches, all rivers and creeks are intelligently designed?
323 posted on
12/06/2007 10:25:44 AM PST by
js1138
To: Southack
You're contradicting yourself. If we are engineering new life forms, then ID explains all such new species, scientifically. That means that ID is a valid theory. It conclusively explains something without question. No, I'm not contradicting myself. You're just not understanding: just because man can do something artificially doesn't mean that that is the only way it can be done. Another example: Lake Mead, behind Hoover Dam, is man-made. Does that mean that all lakes are the result of some Intelligent Dammer?
324 posted on
12/06/2007 11:23:11 AM PST by
LibertarianSchmoe
("...yeah, but, that's different!" - mating call of the North American Ten-Toed Hypocrite)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson