One could say the same about you! If you had self-perception then you'd see yourself as the Black Knight, someone who doesn't know when he's been utterly beaten:
One could say the same about you! If you had self-perception then you'd see yourself as the Black Knight, someone who doesn't know when he's been utterly beaten:
Dear child, I am not an expert, although I have read on the subject of evolution for about 50 years. Finding an error in something I say is no more significant than finding an error in a newspaper account of science.
I merely point out that you have unilaterally declared yourself smarter than tens of thousands of PhD biologists, not to mention scads of information theorists and computer scientists who make a good living modelling, as best they can, the Darwinian version of evolution.
When I Google phrases like “DNA code-skipping” I find only one expert who thinks it is worth mentioning, and that expert would be someone calling himself southhack and publishing on FreeRepublic. Perhaps southhack is using an idiosyncratic term for something real scientists call by another name. Or maybe code-skipping is bullshit. If not, it would be interesting to know why folks like Behe, Dembski, Yockey, and Denton haven’t gone public with this devastating rebuttal to evolution.
Perhaps they don’t believe humans are descended from modern fish.
As I say, I am not an expert, but I have read widely on the history of science. It is worth noting that nearly all of the crushing criticisms of evolution were widely discussed a hundred years ago, most of them two hundred years ago.