Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nathan Zachary; All
This isn't just a U.S. vs. Mexico dispute here. It also involves major U.S. trucking companies (who support the plan to allow Mexican trucks into the U.S.) vs. independent owner-operators (who are adamantly opposed to it).

What sometimes gets lost in the shuffle here is that the cross-border trucking program was a specific provision of NAFTA -- which means the U.S. really isn't on solid legal grounds to prevent its implementation.

94 posted on 12/01/2007 11:57:42 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
What sometimes gets lost in the shuffle here is that the cross-border trucking program was a specific provision of NAFTA -- which means the U.S. really isn't on solid legal grounds to prevent its implementation.

That is not true. NAFTA is a law not a treaty. Congress can alter or abolish any previous law buy passing a new one. It can also effectively neuter a previously passed law by refusing to fund its enforcement.

97 posted on 12/01/2007 12:30:27 PM PST by Colorado Buckeye (It's the culture stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson