Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tear gas

That’s silly. Since you cannot prove a crime, it must be only because the evidence was destroyed.


27 posted on 11/30/2007 6:19:53 PM PST by Perdogg (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Perdogg

Well, you know - no controlling legal authority.


30 posted on 11/30/2007 6:27:09 PM PST by TitansAFC ("My 80% enemy is not my 20% friend" -- Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
LOL. It isn't MY job to prove a crime. It may be, though, that there will now evidence for people who do prosecute crimes back there. It reminds me a lot of the Duke Cunningham mess. I recall him also saying that no one would be able to prove he was engaged in criminal misconduct.

And, beyond that, I think you're making a mistake if you think the American people are going to be impressed by a candidate's claim that this clear abuse of his position must be excused unless he is first convicted of a crime. I think Rudy's candidacy is effectively over.

And that's the way God wants it.

31 posted on 11/30/2007 6:27:12 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Hard to find out anything when Giuliani stole his mayoral records and put them under lock and key, against all tradition.

I wonder what he’s hiding in there?


57 posted on 11/30/2007 8:19:32 PM PST by Politicalmom (Huckabee is the GOP's Jimmy Carter. Are you ready for the plundering of your pocketbook?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson