I love the way the journalist discusses Algores pedigree without really discussing it. Just adding for emphasis “academy award winner” and “Nobel Peace Prize Winner” in a sterile academic way that in no way touches upon the many challenges to Algores views. Nor does the author touch upon the left leaning nature of the Nobel Peace Prize. Nor does the Author report the left wing fringe that Algore is. But the author speaks in dispassionate, dignified prose... I guess I must believe him ‘cause he sound so smart.
I just really want to bust the whole premise that surrounds this article.
We live in an era where documentaries don’t have to be factual to be rewarded with honors as long as they are politically correct.
We live in an era where nightly news broadcasts can use forged documents so long as they are fake but accurate in their politics.
We live in an era where debates are not open to debate. The candidates of one party get to submit their own questions and call on their own plants while the candidates of the other party must exclusively be lynched by activists from the opposition party.