Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Media barely even trying to hide its bias
ModernConservative.com ^ | Christopher Cook

Posted on 11/30/2007 5:07:09 AM PST by connell

In 2004, Newsweek's Evan Thomas described media bias as being worth 15 points to the Democrats. I do not believe that is any exaggeration, and I believe it applies to almost every race.

Consider the following:

The MSM is trying to use permatantrum™ and fibrication™ techniques to talk us into a recession, or worse. Meanwhile, most sectors of he economy are screaming along at a pace that is the envy of the developed world...

Horrid Economy Stalls to Only 4.9% GDP Growth
About That Economy....


Next, the Washington Times and Michelle Malkin have updates on even more plants at the CNN debate than were at first realized. CNN cannot be this incompetent; it's just hard to imagine this not being intentional, even if it occurred at a level below Anderson Cooper's perceptual threshold. (Powerline indicates that Bill Otis suspects that someone was getting worked here; this was no coincidence or mistake.) Also, according to Malkin, CNN is removing some of the planted questioners' clips from their rebroadcast: Rewriting the historical record: an act worthy of Josef Stalin.


Then, there's fact that an NBC host called George W. Bush a "monkey," and then only moments later...

(Excerpt) Read more at modernconservative.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; left; media; mediabias
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: hinckley buzzard

Exactly.


61 posted on 11/30/2007 5:29:59 PM PST by connell (She must be stopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

There are bozos in every aspect of life, and the Republican Party is no exception. However, the GOP is, in aggregate form, way way way better than the Dems! Also, we (the GOP) have a noble history. The Dems’ history is as the party of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow, the KKK, and opposition to every piece of civil rights legislation the GOP attempted to pass. Then, just as they were getting that out of their system, they became the nothing more than the American arm of the international marxist-leninist left. There is no contest and no comparison between the two. Sinistrum delenda est.


62 posted on 11/30/2007 5:33:54 PM PST by connell (She must be stopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

MSM Journalistic creed:

We are salespeople.

We use sensationalism and controversy to get the public to watch what we are selling.

In the event there is no sensationalism or controversy, make some up.


63 posted on 11/30/2007 5:49:47 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (- Attention all planets of the solar Federation--Secret plan codeword: Banana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: connell
In 2004, Newsweek's Evan Thomas described media bias as being worth 15 points to the Democrats.

Does that mean Effin' Kerry's complete defeat is much worse than initially imagined?

64 posted on 11/30/2007 5:59:27 PM PST by Libloather (Hillary donors find their way to the cover of Time. And the very next day they're doing it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: getitright

“The trouble is, liberals in the news game and in academia will likely always be the majority.”

That’s why we have to start thinking outside the corral if we’re going to beat ‘em.


65 posted on 11/30/2007 6:42:21 PM PST by Bob J (For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, there is one striking at its root)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

You have it.


66 posted on 11/30/2007 6:47:23 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

80% of journalists subscribe to one set of opinions because 80% of the people hiring those journalists subscribe to the same set of opinions.

Prior to 1960 the media was predominately conservative, probably for the same reason. I’m not saying either was wrong but the outcome was. America can only survive with a balanced information dissemination system.


67 posted on 11/30/2007 6:54:24 PM PST by Bob J (For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, there is one striking at its root)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Before 1960, the American elite was, if not conservative, then not liberal. General Eisenhower was representative of that generation of leaders. They have been called the Protestant Establishment. But by 1965, that generation had died off, their places to be taken by the “Great Generation,.” whose legacy has been more mixed, and by Baby boomers who are mainly liberal—liberal in the European sense.


68 posted on 11/30/2007 7:05:57 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Yes, by 5 to 15 million votes.


69 posted on 12/01/2007 5:28:46 AM PST by connell (She must be stopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson