Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: torchthemummy

I’ll bet the general has lied about more than that. If he didn’t come out of the closet until after he retired doesn’t that mean he lied on documents when he entered the service?


35 posted on 11/29/2007 6:24:21 PM PST by abigailsmybaby (I was born with nothing. So far I have most of it left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: abigailsmybaby

Good point and most assuredly the case if you buy the gay lobby’s assertion that being gay is genetic. If you don’t then the General has disproved one of their #1 defenses.


39 posted on 11/29/2007 6:47:22 PM PST by torchthemummy ("A Tagline Presidential Endorsement Forfeits A Presumption Of Objectivity")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: abigailsmybaby
I’ll bet the general has lied about more than that. If he didn’t come out of the closet until after he retired doesn’t that mean he lied on documents when he entered the service?

Most likely yes. I'm pretty sure my original enlistment papers in 1982 still asked if you were queer. And I know pre-don't-ask-don't-tell security clearance checks did.

40 posted on 11/29/2007 6:48:25 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: abigailsmybaby

So this guy was really a California National Guard Colonel. Another great job by CNN’s Anderson Pooper!


60 posted on 11/29/2007 8:03:19 PM PST by Plains Drifter (If guns kill people, wouldn't there be a lot of dead people at gun shows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: abigailsmybaby
If he didn’t come out of the closet until after he retired doesn’t that mean he lied on documents when he entered the service?

Good question. Wonder if knowingly providing false information would jeopardize his pension?

65 posted on 11/29/2007 8:19:57 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: All; abigailsmybaby
If he didn’t come out of the closet until after he retired doesn’t that mean he lied on documents when he entered the service?

Of course he lied then just as he lied by omission by not revealing his participation in Hillary's campaign. I don't care that he was in for 43 years, his character is deeply flawed and it has little to do with his sexuality.

Here's an excerpt of a profile: "General Kerr retired on 1 June 1996 after 43 years of service to the United States and the State of California... / The Rev. Dr. Alvin Gomer, Episcopal priest and licensed psychologist, was his partner of 26 years. Dr. Gomer died in 2000."

Thus he was hooked up with Gomer from 1974 onward which would include retiring from the U. S. Army Reserve in 1986 with the rank of Colonel, his commission in the CA National Guard and later his promotion "to Brigadier General on 21 February 1991."

87 posted on 11/30/2007 1:36:20 AM PST by newzjunkey (“Market forces” demanded serfs and market forces got them. - Kolokotronis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: abigailsmybaby
Well, he's not even a real general. He left the U.S. Army in 1960 as a 1st Looie, and then rose through the ranks of something called the California State Military Reserve, which apparently is a back-up outfit to the California National Guard.
93 posted on 11/30/2007 4:28:03 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson