Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bernanke Signals Possible Rate Cut
Wall Street Journal ^ | 30 November 2007 | News staff

Posted on 11/29/2007 4:29:39 PM PST by shrinkermd

U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said the latest bout of financial-market turbulence may put additional strain on the U.S. economy, signaling he is open to additional cuts in interest rates.

In a text of remarks prepared for delivery last night in Charlotte, North Carolina, Mr. Bernanke said the housing downturn and related mortgage troubles are adding "greater than usual" uncertainty to the economic outlook. "These developments have resulted in a further tightening in financial conditions, which has the potential to impose additional restraint on activity in housing markets and in other credit-sensitive sectors," he said.

His comments echoed the statements of Fed Vice Chairman Donald Kohn on Wednesday, whose remarks led markets to conclude that Fed policy makers may cut interest rates to offset the risks posed by credit-market turbulence.

Separately, the U.S. government sharply raised its estimate of third-quarter economic growth, saying the economy expanded at an annualized pace of 4.9%, a full percentage point above the previous estimate. But that did nothing to alter perceptions that growth is grinding nearly to a halt in the current quarter.

Underscoring the spreading weakness was an increase in new claims for unemployment insurance to the highest level since February, an indication that the labor market is beginning to deteriorate

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bernanke; fed; federalreserve; fedfunds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

1 posted on 11/29/2007 4:29:40 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

2 posted on 11/29/2007 4:32:42 PM PST by BGHater (Lead. The MSG for the 21st Century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

You know we’re doomed, right?


3 posted on 11/29/2007 4:35:40 PM PST by upchuck (Hildabeaste as Prez... unimaginable, devastating misery! She will redefine "How bad can it get?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Watch the pre-market numbers tomorrow morning. They’ll the put the controls on by noon.


4 posted on 11/29/2007 4:38:23 PM PST by toddlintown (Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Why have anyone one work for a Dollar?

Why not have the Fed simply give them away?

These clowns devaluing my paycheck make me sick.

5 posted on 11/29/2007 4:38:35 PM PST by Mark was here (Hard work never killed anyone, but why take the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said the latest bout of financial-market turbulence may put additional strain on the U.S. economy, signaling he is open to additional cuts in interest rates.

Is this guy for real? The dollar's already dead. The cost of imported goods, including OIL is, and will continue to rise as a result of the drop in the value of the dollar. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be an issue to Bernanke. I guess oil's not important since energy prices are not included in the government's base inflation calculation.

6 posted on 11/29/2007 4:38:57 PM PST by meyer (Illegal Immigration - The profits are privatized, the costs are socialized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

” You know we’re doomed, right? “

Always expect the worst. You’ll never be disappointed.


7 posted on 11/29/2007 4:39:39 PM PST by Humble Servant (Keep it simple - do what's right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Mrs. Clinton’s not having a good week with this news


8 posted on 11/29/2007 4:40:16 PM PST by BlabItGrabIt (Anyone opposing rate cuts is in Hillery's or Rudy's camp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Thank God Greenspan isn’t in charge. He’d still be increasing the rates.


9 posted on 11/29/2007 4:44:59 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I’m curious. Considering taxes and inflation, what kind of return does one have to make on investments just to “break even”? 6%? 7%? If the Fed keeps this up, there’s gonna be no way for me to keep up.


10 posted on 11/29/2007 4:47:25 PM PST by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Hope he stops sometime before the Saudis own majority in Citi Corp.
11 posted on 11/29/2007 4:48:17 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meyer

If oil as high as it is for several years, the # of alternative energy products will crush the oil industry for good. I plan to buy a Chevy Volt when it comes out just so I can stop sending $$ overseas. Sure it may cost more up front, but I can drive to and from work every day and around town w/o ever filling up and I’m not sending any $$ to the Middle East or Venezuela. With prices this high, it makes an environmental out of all of us—just the economical variety instead of the wacky globull warming variety.


12 posted on 11/29/2007 4:51:37 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

The sky is falling. No but the dollar is.


13 posted on 11/29/2007 5:00:17 PM PST by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Thank God Greenspan isn’t in charge. He’d still be increasing the rates.

He should have increased it more rapidly back in 2002-2003 after dropping it right after 9/11. Keeping it too low for too long presented cheap money - so cheap that even non-creditworthy borrowers had access.

And cheap credit is part of the reason that we have the hyped sub-prime loan mess.

14 posted on 11/29/2007 5:08:52 PM PST by meyer (Illegal Immigration - The profits are privatized, the costs are socialized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: meyer

The subprime mess is a matter of credit quality, not excessive monetary growth. The FDIC should have acted the minute they heard of interest only loans.


15 posted on 11/29/2007 5:12:08 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: meyer
I know the conventional wisdom is that the dollar is dead, we are in a serious bout of inflation, etc.

But if you look at the long bond (30 year) the interest rate is remarkably low. The Fed has no control over this. Bond buyers usually insist on 2% plus inflation. Just look at the chart: HERE.

I also note gold has slowed its climb and the stock market has become very volatile. More signs of potential deflation. Things can change quickly, but right now bond buyers are willing to buy the long bond at less than 5% on a regular basis. Sooner or later the Fed has to bring the short term rates (Fed Funds et Discount) down. So maybe Bernanke isn't such an idiot after all.

16 posted on 11/29/2007 5:15:24 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The subprime mess is a matter of credit quality, not excessive monetary growth.

They are actually the same thing.

17 posted on 11/29/2007 5:24:43 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The subprime mess is a matter of credit quality, not excessive monetary growth.

They're very related. When the market is flooded with low-cost (low interest rate) money, that low cost money spreads into the loan industry. Not just low-rate fixed loans with 20% down, but all sorts of loans. In the subprime market, those 16% loans become affordable 10% loans, and with a 5% teaser rate.

The FDIC should have acted the minute they heard of interest only loans.,/

They'd have had to act many, many years ago - interest-only loans are not new. What's somewhat new, at least in the last 30 years or so, is the large abundance of such loans.

Interest-only loans, in and of themselves aren't so much a problem - they have their place. But giving interest-only loans to people with poor credit has been proven to be a mistake in the past. Apparently, that lesson has to be repeated occasionally.

18 posted on 11/29/2007 5:44:19 PM PST by meyer (Illegal Immigration - The profits are privatized, the costs are socialized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

They are only the same thing if the regulators are not doing their jobs.


19 posted on 11/29/2007 5:53:07 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Yay! Free Money!


20 posted on 11/29/2007 5:56:14 PM PST by afnamvet (Duncan Hunter in 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson