Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Denies Role in Gays-in-Military Debate Question
Wall Street Journal ^

Posted on 11/29/2007 10:04:25 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Clinton Denies Role in Gays-in-Military Debate Question

June Kronholz reports on the presidential race.

Sen. Hillary Clinton was put on the defense by questions linking her campaign to retired Brig Gen. Keith Kerr, whose question on gays in the military briefly electrified last night’s Republican debate. Following the CNN/YouTube debate, moderator Anderson Cooper announced that bloggers were claiming that Kerr served on Clinton’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender steering committee, and quickly apologized for including his question.

Clinton’s campaign hotly denied that the question, posed in a YouTube video, was a “plant” by the campaign. “We didn’t do this, we had nothing to do with this guy, he was acting on his own,” spokesman Phil Singer said in an interview. Singer said he expected questions about the incident from “right-wing bloggers,” but not from news outlets as worthy as this one.

“There’s nothing here,” he added.

Kerr said he didn’t ask the question on the Clinton campaign’s behalf in a CNN interview this morning. He said he had only lent his name to the campaign and hadn’t given it any money. “This was a private initiative,” he said of his question. Still, it was an unwelcome diversion for the New York senator and Democratic front-runner as she heads into the final weeks before the Iowa caucus.

Kerr asked on video why the candidates thought that “American men and women in uniform are not professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians.” After answers by Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee, Kerr, who was in the audience, was handed a CNN microphone and invited to comment on their response.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; debate; democratparty; duncanhunter; elections; hillary; hillaryplant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: sr4402

Look for a Clinton operative at CNN involved with the selection of questions.

Clinton Inc has infiltrated the MSM with moles.

A Clinton lawyer was at the Enquirer dishing dirt on Edwards.


21 posted on 11/29/2007 10:20:25 AM PST by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Clinton’s campaign hotly denied that the question, posed in a YouTube video, was a “plant” by the campaign.....Sure! and snowbirds fly in hell.


22 posted on 11/29/2007 10:25:41 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Of course he was a Hillary plant. Exposing this is not helping Hillary. The big loser was CNN.


23 posted on 11/29/2007 10:26:02 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I can’t recall?


24 posted on 11/29/2007 10:28:05 AM PST by b4its2late (GITMO is way too nice of a place to house low life terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: y6162
A Clinton lawyer was at the Enquirer dishing dirt on Edwards

Already done.

Enquirer says Edwards had affair as wife fought cancer By Herald staff

Thursday, October 11, 2007 -

The National Enquirer is reporting that Democratic presidential candidatehad an affair with a former campaign worker while his wife Elizabeth was battling breast cancer.

The newspaper cited friends of the “other woman” and qualified its report saying “if proven true,” it could devastate the campaign. An Edwards spokesman told the Enquirer the allegations are “false, absolute nonsense.” The Enquirer said the woman refused repeated requests for comment.

25 posted on 11/29/2007 10:34:43 AM PST by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hillary is so devious she not only plants questioners in her own “townhall meetings,” she plants them in Repubican debates.


26 posted on 11/29/2007 10:34:45 AM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: y6162
Look for a Clinton operative at CNN involved with the selection of questions. Clinton Inc has infiltrated the MSM with moles. A Clinton lawyer was at the Enquirer dishing dirt on Edwards.

BINGO.

27 posted on 11/29/2007 10:35:46 AM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Clinton denies”....seems Like Ive heard that song before.


28 posted on 11/29/2007 10:38:14 AM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

co-genital liar too! ;)


29 posted on 11/29/2007 10:38:31 AM PST by robomatik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
This has been the MO for the Clintons, Dems, and MSM for decades.

They're now getting caught...finally.

30 posted on 11/29/2007 10:38:47 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Hillary seems to never be aware of whats going on around her. True presidential material.
31 posted on 11/29/2007 10:45:11 AM PST by californio (Coast Guard Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"I got nuttin' to do wid it. You got no evidence. You can't prove nuttin'."

Ah, the old-time Clinton refrain. And the folks who taped Newt were just "concerned citizens." And the FBI files were just a silly "bureaucratic SNAFU." And the guys who smeared the late Henry Hyde (RIP) were independent jounalists who just happened on the story at a purely coincidental time. Better get used to it, folks - this is what the next Clinton administration is going to look like and we're all just rightwing haters for pointing it out.

32 posted on 11/29/2007 10:45:56 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up
They're now getting caught...finally.

I count 3 Plants so far. The General, The Abortion Questioner, and The Union Questioner. There may be another

33 posted on 11/29/2007 10:47:43 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

There have been hundreds over the years.


34 posted on 11/29/2007 10:49:28 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hillary’s biggest problem is that she has NO credibility.


35 posted on 11/29/2007 11:00:41 AM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Some people are overly skeptical. Probably the same people who won't believe Hillary about the gay general don't believe her explanation about how she turned $1,000 into $100,000 by reading The Wall Street Journal.
36 posted on 11/29/2007 11:12:46 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I refuse to watch debates but I’m curious if the plant’s question did any kind of damage to anybody. I assume that every Republican candidate opposes gays in the military.


37 posted on 11/29/2007 11:18:18 AM PST by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Hillary Clinton didn’t deny anything...some spokesperson did...again.
38 posted on 11/29/2007 11:26:14 AM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Hitlery’s entire law career at the Rose Law Firm was the location and destruction of paper trails for crooks .......... Oooops I mean clients.
39 posted on 11/29/2007 11:27:26 AM PST by fella (The proper application of the truth far more important than the knowledge of it's existance."Ike")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Right. Like they’d admit it.


40 posted on 11/29/2007 11:28:43 AM PST by Antoninus (Republicans who support Rudy owe Bill Clinton an apology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson