“Hunter always looks and sounds good but he cant win the nomination.
You know...I see and hear this all the time. What I have not seen nor heard is WHY NOT?”
Because, unfortunately, the nomination of the two major parties is about 99 percent preordained. Good case in point: who ever heard of Bill Clinton before he was nominated — and he was the front runner almost all the way to the nomination. Clinton and his operatives did the grass roots work years before he ran. Ditto with Pres. Bush, and I could go on.
The only thing that makes Hilliary a little more vulnerable with the Dems this time, is that she’s a woman and that Bill would be in the white house on her apron strings. She is still the Dem pick. She won’t be president. I wouldn’t be too surprised if the drops out before the general election and Edwards gets the nom. by default.
Guiliani is the flavor of the 2008 election pols and only has real competition from Romney, who has a great political organization and is squeaky clean. All the others are running for the second spot.
With all that said, Hunter would be a great VEEP or in a high level cabinet post.
Remember, a candidate does not have to win the popular vote to win the race.
Look for Charlie Crist on the GOP horizon along with Jeb Bush — maybe 2012 or 2016.
the nomination of the two major parties is about 99 percent preordained
Thank you for your honesty! I've known for 20 years my vote means nothing.
Hunter would be a great VEEP or in a high level cabinet post.
Congressman Hunter would never lower himself to be a VP to Rudy or Mitt.
Remember, a candidate does not have to win the popular vote to win the race.
Oh...I remember!!! I was an adult and ILL during the '90s.
maybe 2012 or 2016.
Depending on the outcome of the '08 election. If it goes the wrong way, it may be our last.
If you're correct in your prediction, I won't be objecting when President Rodham takes her cue from Chavez and demands to be named "President for Life." /s