You forgot to courtesy ping MAexile after posting his comment in your reply. That’s a big transgression in evoland. Shame on you.
Nice try at character assassination but the Crusades eliminating the followers of a deranged, pedophile, warlord is not genocide. Nobody is killing them because of their race; it’s simply self-defense.
In case you aren’t aware, their whole mission is to destroy us. What rock have you been living under?
What else do you do to a rabid animal that’s trying to kill you?
You are right, my apologies to MAexile.
"Nice try at character assassination but the Crusades eliminating the followers of a deranged, pedophile, warlord is not genocide. Nobody is killing them because of their race; its simply self-defense.
Nice rationalization but it doesn't wash. You are advocating the elimination of an entire group of people. That is genocide. There is no justification for wiping out an entire group based on the actions of a few.
"In case you arent aware, their whole mission is to destroy us. What rock have you been living under?
Nonsense. You are advocating in your comments above that all Muslims should have been wiped out, whether or not they were active participants in the battles of the crusades. This is a vile suggestion. This kind of logic suggests that we should wipe out entire populations based on their potential impact on future generations. Perhaps the US should wipe out Canada, man woman and child, because at one time they invaded the US and burned a few DC buildings and God knows they could repeat the act.
"What else do you do to a rabid animal thats trying to kill you?
You kill the animal, you don't go on a jihad and destroy the entire population.