Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom; MAexile
"You forgot to courtesy ping MAexile after posting his comment in your reply. That’s a big transgression in evoland. Shame on you.

You are right, my apologies to MAexile.

"Nice try at character assassination but the Crusades eliminating the followers of a deranged, pedophile, warlord is not genocide. Nobody is killing them because of their race; it’s simply self-defense.

Nice rationalization but it doesn't wash. You are advocating the elimination of an entire group of people. That is genocide. There is no justification for wiping out an entire group based on the actions of a few.

"In case you aren’t aware, their whole mission is to destroy us. What rock have you been living under?

Nonsense. You are advocating in your comments above that all Muslims should have been wiped out, whether or not they were active participants in the battles of the crusades. This is a vile suggestion. This kind of logic suggests that we should wipe out entire populations based on their potential impact on future generations. Perhaps the US should wipe out Canada, man woman and child, because at one time they invaded the US and burned a few DC buildings and God knows they could repeat the act.

"What else do you do to a rabid animal that’s trying to kill you?

You kill the animal, you don't go on a jihad and destroy the entire population.

207 posted on 12/02/2007 7:57:42 PM PST by b_sharp ("Science without intelligence is lame, religion without personal integrity is reprehensible"-Sealion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: b_sharp
You are advocating in your comments above that all Muslims should have been wiped out, whether or not they were active participants in the battles of the crusades.

No, I'm not. You're reading way more into it than was meant.

There is no justification for wiping out an entire group based on the actions of a few.

For one thing, it's not the actions of a few; it's many who participate in this. For another, their whole *religion* (and I use the term loosely) demands the elimination of the infidels. It's required of all of them. So where is the condemnation of those few by the many if they didn't really support them?

You kill the animal, you don't go on a jihad and destroy the entire population.

Which is what they are trying to do to us. We need to eliminate as much of the threat as necessary.

You know, if you don't support our troops mission of putting an end to jihad and the islamic threat for our own safety, and the safety of the civilization of the entire planet, perhaps FR isn't quite the place for you. There have certainly got to be other places that support islam and jihad on the internet.

210 posted on 12/03/2007 10:00:25 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

To: b_sharp
You are right, my apologies to MAexile.

Just to make a point, I will accept your apology, and not call you an infidel and then cut your head off.

211 posted on 12/03/2007 12:01:26 PM PST by MAexile (Bats left, votes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson