Skip to comments.
Why A Nile Tadpole Means A Great Deal
The Times (UK) ^
| 11-22-2007
| George Hart
Posted on 11/26/2007 6:55:06 AM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Thanks to Renfield for the article.
1
posted on
11/26/2007 6:55:07 AM PST
by
blam
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on
11/26/2007 6:55:35 AM PST
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: blam
From the picture, I think the vulture is trying to tell us that the optometrist on a skiing vacation.
3
posted on
11/26/2007 6:59:35 AM PST
by
TexGuy
To: blam; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...
4
posted on
11/26/2007 8:04:15 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Sunday, November 18, 2007"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
WHAT?
And I thought I had trouble with modern math....
*sheesh*
5
posted on
11/26/2007 8:27:29 AM PST
by
Monkey Face
(If we are what we eat, I'm cheap, fast and easy.)
To: SunkenCiv
WHAT?
And I thought I had trouble with modern math....
*sheesh*
6
posted on
11/26/2007 8:27:29 AM PST
by
Monkey Face
(If we are what we eat, I'm cheap, fast and easy.)
To: Monkey Face
7
posted on
11/26/2007 8:32:51 AM PST
by
Monkey Face
(If we are what we eat, I'm cheap, fast and easy.)
To: blam
I have been wondering since the sixties what a cubit is.
“Riiiiight. What’s a cubit?”
8
posted on
11/26/2007 8:38:26 AM PST
by
patton
(cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
To: patton
For a detailed description see The Secrets of the Great Pyramid by Peter Thompkins.
In addition to that described, there were more formal and accurate definitions of the cubit used in work describing extreme accuracy.
9
posted on
11/26/2007 8:49:44 AM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Moveon is not us...... Moveon is the enemy)
To: bert
Hey, um, bert? It was a reference to an old Bill Cosby skit...
humor, y’know?
10
posted on
11/26/2007 8:52:14 AM PST
by
patton
(cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
To: patton
....humor, yknow?...
Read the book anyway...you’ll like it ;)
11
posted on
11/26/2007 8:53:39 AM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Moveon is not us...... Moveon is the enemy)
To: bert
12
posted on
11/26/2007 8:58:43 AM PST
by
patton
(cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
To: Monkey Face
Well, it looks like you’ve got multiplication down. ;’)
13
posted on
11/26/2007 9:04:48 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Sunday, November 18, 2007"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: blam
If the above numbers were written under or beside the mouth sign, meaning a part, then that indicated fractions. However, in measuring bushels of wheat, often used for payment in Egypt which had no coinage, a specialist system of indicating numerals was used. This took the sign of the human eye with the markings of a falcons cheek below it known as the eye of Horus, above and broke it into separate parts so that the eyebrow, for instance, equalled one eighth and the pupil one quarter. The fractions then added up to 63/64, so the missing 1/64 was supplied magically by the god Thoth who was responsible for mathematical accuracy.Now wonder why the babylon's used 60 and 360 as some of basics....of their math systems....?
> An overview of Babylonian mathematics
*****************EXCERPT****************
The Babylonians had an advanced number system, in some ways more advanced than our present systems. It was a positional system with a base of 60 rather than the system with base 10 in widespread use today. For more details of the Babylonian numerals, and also a discussion as to the theories why they used base 60, see our article on Babylonian numerals.
To: Monkey Face
See link at post #14 for some ancient math that isn’t at all simple.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv
Modern math ain’t all that simple, either!
And I never could get multiplication right. *sigh*
16
posted on
11/26/2007 11:19:47 AM PST
by
Monkey Face
(If we are what we eat, I'm cheap, fast and easy.)
To: Monkey Face
Don’t feel bad, I have to take off my shoes to count past ten.
...and I have a degree in Math...
Look, those of you who think 2+2=4, arent thinking about it enough.
17
posted on
11/26/2007 12:43:41 PM PST
by
patton
(cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
To: patton
See? I can’t think about it enough to get past 2+2=4....
I have trouble with my checkbook: How can I be overdrawn when I still have checks left?
18
posted on
11/26/2007 12:52:29 PM PST
by
Monkey Face
(If we are what we eat, I'm cheap, fast and easy.)
To: Monkey Face
Well, if you define an abelion group with unity, revolving around your check book, you are not overdrawn, while you have checks.
...errr, let me know how that works out with the bank.
19
posted on
11/26/2007 12:56:37 PM PST
by
patton
(cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
To: patton
The bank corrected my faulty thinking. They said it might be better if I used an ATM card and bought money orders....
20
posted on
11/26/2007 12:59:22 PM PST
by
Monkey Face
(If we are what we eat, I'm cheap, fast and easy.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson