Since they are EXACTLY THE SAME, it won't matter...
If Guiliani wins the nomination and y’all don’t support him or vote third party you might as well be voting for Hillary.
And yes she is much, much worse. Guiliani will pick conservative judges — given that the next president has at least two supreme court picks — that is huge.
No, he won’t.
“Guiliani will pick conservative judges”
Not based on his past record.
“If Guiliani wins the nomination and y’all don’t support him or vote third party you might as well be voting for Hillary.”
If you support Rudy, YOU might as well be supporting Hillary...
“Guiliani will pick conservative judges — given that the next president has at least two supreme court picks — that is huge.”
You should have watched the video before you commented. Giuliani says the “strict constructionists” he’d appoint might support Roe v. Wade. That’s one of the main points I was trying to make in the Hannity forums before they banned me. Sean has been a borderline liar about this.
From Larry King Live:
KING: Yet you’ll say you’ll appoint judges who are strict constructionists. If that’s the case, they’re going to vote to overturn “Roe v. Wade,” which you don’t want.
GIULIANI: I don’t know that. You don’t know that.
KING: Well, what is strict constructionist?
GIULIANI: Well, OK, there are a lot of ways to explain that. I mean (UNINTELLIGIBLE)... KING: Do you still favor “”Roe v. Wade?””
GIULIANI: I am pro-choice, yes. But I — I’m also, as you know — always have been — against abortion, hate abortion, don’t like it, wouldn’t personally advise anyone to have an abortion and — but I believe a woman has a right to choose.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0702/14/lkl.01.html
Leopards don’t change their spots.
Guiliani will not nominate conservative, pro-life judges. That is the biggest lie of the campaign....thus far.
Our Govenator Swartzebegger has appointed more democrat judges than Republican judges...
Bull crap. If Giuliani is the best the Republicans can do, then they can do without me. If it comes down to Hillary or Rudy, then my guns are history. The lesser of two evils is still evil. If Rudy is the nominee, then the Republican Party needs to do some serious soul searching. In the meantime, I'll be searching for someone else to vote for.
Do you still believe in the tooth fairy, too?
I agree. Hillary is much worse. Hell, any of the current dems are much worse.
I think Guiliani will choose conservative SC judges and I think he’d be good on WOT. He’d suck on immigration and border control, imo. I hate his stand on abortion and gay rights.
At this point, I’ll vote repub no matter what. I’m still waiting to see what happens, who wins the repub primary. But I won’t vote 3rd party at this point.
I like to see/read what people are saying, etc. I’d much rather have a fiscal and social conservative with strong immigration and border control ideas and implementation plan but I don’t see that yet.
The repub party is losing me. Half the time I can’t tell a dem from a repub. Sometimes, our current govt. sucks. I’m all for a strong 3rd party but I don’t see it happening this election. It will take years to build but maybe in 2012, it will be possible.
I won’t throw my vote away, by voting 3rd or whatever party this time. I’d rather have anyone but a dem, esp. Hillary, as President next year.
What makes you think Rudy will pick conservative Judges, much less strict constructionist judges. This is the guy who said that he believes the right to abortion is a constitutional right and that he could “...see a strict constructionist judge upholding Roe v. Wade”
Clearly, Rudy doesn’t have a clue as to what strict constructionist means, but at the end of the day, do you believe that Rudy would donate all that money to NARL over a period of years and then appoint a judge that will rule against NARL.
And I’m sick of that a vote for anybody but Rudy in the general election is a vote for Clinton. With Clinton in office, at least we can pursue a conservative amendment without hesitation, whereas with Rudy, we will spend 4 years embracing a liberal agenda on immigration, gay marriage, gun control etc., The conservative movement may be stronger after 4 years of opposing Hillary, but it may never recover after 4 years of supporting Rudy.
And what guarantee has he made to make you believe that, especially seeing that he is liberal on most everything?
Since they are EXACTLY THE SAME, it won't matter...
Congress will pass the Fairness Doctrine as a Congressional Act
Unless the USSC issues a sweeping ruling affirming traditional and plain understanding of the 2nd Amd, the Congress will pass lots of legislation that will ultimately amount to confiscation.
Giuliani cannot get conservative judges through the congress he will face and his 2nd and 3rd choices will go through and will be mostly picked by the Democrats in Congress for him to nominate. He will pick(2nd or 3rd) nonentities for USSC who will warp left within a year of being seated.
He will not be worth much in the War because he will be at the direction of a left Congress.
Giuliani as the Republican nominee is the only sure thing for another Clinton presidency. If nominated he will not be elected because he will drive away his SoCon votes and those stay-at-home voters will leave the field to the Democrats up and down the ticket. Rudynauts will gnash their teeth and "blame" the SoCons for being hardheaded or stupid and will feel better about the loss because of the perceived orneriness of Christians but it is how things will work out. It is a given. They rail against something that has almost the stature of a natural law.
Oh, well.
And yes she is much, much worse.
I see little difference.
Guiliani will pick conservative judges
Hogwash.
Sure. Rudy nominated LOTS of conservative judges when he was Mayor of NYC. /sarc
That is weak, very weak. A liberal dirtbag is a liberal dirtbag. Why will he appoint conservative judges? Because he said so on the campaign trail? Abortion, 2nd mmendment ...he’s done more tapdancing than a “Lawrence Welk” traveling show. Did he have a come to Jesus moment only on Judges. What other constitutional things has he had a come to Jesus moment with.
Leadership I don’t doubt. That is where he shines above Hillary. Oter than that there is not much difference. Why not Bloomber. He has an “R” behind his name as well ... and was a democrat before just like Rudy.
Sorry ...Ohio is a state full of RINO dirtbags. We threw one senator put and another one should have been and will be. Nothing more worthless than a crybaby like Voinabitch that has his parts rubbed raw straddling a fence. I detest people lke that. The Senate is full of them .... one by one they are disappearing ...goodby Frist ...Good bye Lott. Don’t let the door hitcha ... where the good lord splitcha.