Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flavius
I did here somewhere that the rate of certain cancers among survivors of Hiroshima and/or Nagasaki was remarkably low. I think the belief was that the dose of radiation which had been received had acted as a preventative chemotherapy treatment.

I have no idea if there's any validity to that, and no, I wouldn't want to sign up for the treatment.

5 posted on 11/24/2007 7:34:41 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

Studies also looked for radiation effects in following generations. Found none, to the stated level of confidence. There was a slightly higher rate of leukemia, but when you look at many different factors, you would expect some to be higher than average.

Yes, the researcher was suprised, but unlike some, was honest.


33 posted on 11/24/2007 9:08:45 PM PST by donmeaker (You may not be interested in War but War is interested in you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson