[cripplecreek]

selective reporting can show just about any voting record in a bad light.

Ain't it the truth. A few days back someone posted that Duncan Hunter had voted in support of McCain Feingold and even posted a link to prove it. I don't know if they didn't read their link or were being deliberately deceptive but I actually looked at it. Turns out that Hunter did vote yes....on a procedural vote to break McCain Feingold into 14 individual parts that could be more easily killed.

[Kurt Evans]

“A few days back someone posted that Duncan Hunter had voted in support of McCain Feingold ...”

Ironically I did the same thing in the Hannity forums after taking the Club for Growth’s claim that Congressman Hunter had “flip-flopped” at face value. I think it was Sun who corrected me, for which I’m most grateful. :-)

[flat]

Ain’t it the truth. A few days back someone posted that Duncan Hunter had voted in support of McCain Feingold and even posted a link to prove it. I don’t know if they didn’t read their link or were being deliberately deceptive but I actually looked at it. Turns out that Hunter did vote yes....on a procedural vote to break McCain Feingold into 14 individual parts that could be more easily killed.

WELL NOW....ERUDITE RESEARCH WINS THE DAY NICE GOING CRIPPLECREEK..WONDER WHY THE CLUB FOR GROWTH GUY NEVER BOTHERED TO EXPLAIN THIS CRUCIAL POINT? HUMMM PRETTY SHABBY...I’LL SAY