“And to sit and claim they don’t support the Phelps, and then turn around and defend their behavior is not only disgusting but trolling.”
I just think this person is truly ‘misinformed’ as to how the Bill of Rights and the Constitution work.
He/she doesn’t seem to understand that the Bill of Rights was written to protect you from Government intrusion and has nothing to do with civilians suing each other.
Liberal talking points can be ingrained in anyone it seems.
Trolls tend to ignore all points directed at them, as in the case of our joe here.
No matter how clear and concise the point, they will respond with more trolling.
They will also see direct statements like Eaker’s as a ‘personal attack’.
Bigh4u2 wrote: “He/she doesn’t seem to understand that the Bill of Rights was written to protect you from Government intrusion and has nothing to do with civilians suing each other.”
Thank you. Aren’t the states also required to follow the Bill of Rights?
From Wikipedia: “Although the First Amendment explicitly prohibits only the named rights from being abridged by laws made by Congress, the courts have interpreted it as applying more broadly. As the first sentence in the body of the Constitution reserves all law-making (”legislative”) authority to Congress, the courts have held that the First Amendment’s terms also extend to the executive and judicial branches. Additionally, in the 20th century the Supreme Court has held that the Due Process clause of the 1868 Fourteenth Amendment “incorporates” the limitations of the First Amendment to restrict also the states.”
It may be an overly broad interpretation of the 1st and 14th Amendments, but if a state says someone can sue me for saying something offensive, then couldn’t that reasonably be ruled to be a restriction on free speech? Wouldn’t that be similar to a state saying someone can sue me for carrying a gun if the plaintiff is frightened/emotionally distressed? Aren’t civil suites (what you can and cannot sue for) defined by law? If so, doesn’t the constitution override civil law, too?