She looks like a horse in a blanket--a blanket that doesn't fit.
This girl has no idea about grace.
1 posted on
11/24/2007 6:15:32 AM PST by
bannie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: bannie
Looking at this photo I’ve finally come to realize that Charles must be out of his cotton-picking mind.
2 posted on
11/24/2007 6:17:28 AM PST by
Gay State Conservative
(Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
To: bannie
She’s definitely a disgrace.
3 posted on
11/24/2007 6:19:56 AM PST by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: bannie
Compared to our Mrs. Clinton, Camilla is a BEAUTY!
4 posted on
11/24/2007 6:21:36 AM PST by
NewCenturions
('S mòr mo mhulad, 's mòr.)
To: bannie
European Dinosaur Bling Ping!
To: bannie
OMG!! Plus she’s got a red string bracelet!!! LOL!! I looked up “TACKY” and there was this same picture.
6 posted on
11/24/2007 6:22:39 AM PST by
Ann Archy
(Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: bannie
I guess they need to design a set of jewels for the Royal Whore. When the Royal males can’t kkep their wedding vows and unwrap their own family jewels for a romp in the hay, those diamonds could shine on the night stand.
8 posted on
11/24/2007 6:23:31 AM PST by
Bulldawg Fan
(Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
To: bannie
Is she missing a front tooth???
9 posted on
11/24/2007 6:24:19 AM PST by
Bulldawg Fan
(Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
To: bannie
She looks awful. Was the crown really necessary? That gold thing on the wall makes her makes her look like the Pope or something.
And what is that red thing tied around her arm/wrist?
10 posted on
11/24/2007 6:24:28 AM PST by
nuconvert
("Terrorism is not the enemy. It is a means to the ends of militant Islamism." MZJ)
To: bannie
With that background, take away the wine glass and she’s a 12th century saint!
11 posted on
11/24/2007 6:25:34 AM PST by
OSHA
(Liberals will lick the boot on their necks if they think the other boot is on yours and mine.)
To: bannie
For pete’s sake. She is a middle-aged woman with grown children and an unfortunate hair style. She has obviously avoided the plastic surgeon. If she had not avoided the plastic surgeon, she would be criticized for that. You will see just as bad, if not worse, in any Walmart, Macy’s, Neiman Marcus or grocery store today. If Charles is happy with her, why does anyone else care? There really is no accounting for taste. And if somebody offered me the chance to wear some of George III’s diamonds, I would take it, too. I take it all the men commenting here look like Antonio Banderas dressed by Giorgio Armani.
12 posted on
11/24/2007 6:29:04 AM PST by
3AngelaD
(They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
To: bannie
13 posted on
11/24/2007 6:29:19 AM PST by
DB
To: bannie
A perfumed pig...is still a pig!
14 posted on
11/24/2007 6:29:31 AM PST by
Don Corleone
(Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
To: bannie
These people are filthy rich, but are they important???
17 posted on
11/24/2007 6:30:17 AM PST by
Iscool
To: bannie
While the diamonds are...well...BIG, I’m more interested in that little snippet of red yarn she’s wearing on her right wrist.
Has the Duchess gone Kabbalah?
Regards,
To: bannie
Honestly, she is not a traditionally pretty woman, but who of you who are posting here actually look better under harsh lights? The fact that Charles fell in love with her, stayed in love with her despite his marriage to a beautiful but highly neurotic woman, and finally broke up with the beauty to marry her speaks well of her character. As Pascal said, "Le coeur a ses raisons que le raison ne connait point. . ." or, "The heart has reasons of which logic understands nothing."
24 posted on
11/24/2007 6:35:02 AM PST by
Fairview
( Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.)
To: bannie
I still have not understood the purpose, value or the public’s facination with those people.
To: bannie
Diana had as much royal blood flowing through her veins as her hubby... this appears to be as much about mocking Diana because only the jewels out of the Queen's box will ever stamp Cammy a royal. Diana was seduced into being selected for one purpose and that was to bear royal children. Once she discovered what the gig was she did not serve quietly.
To: bannie
36 posted on
11/24/2007 6:45:50 AM PST by
freedom4me
(Republicans say government doesn't work. Then they get elected and prove it. --PJ O'Rourke)
To: bannie
Maybe pearls would have been a better choice ...
37 posted on
11/24/2007 6:45:56 AM PST by
maggief
To: bannie
40 posted on
11/24/2007 6:48:11 AM PST by
tioga
(Black Friday........yes, I went shopping and spent some $ today.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson