[Bob J]

“Taking the word of a drug smuggler over two agents?”

Are you referring to the jury of 12 that convicted them? Do you know how contradictory and unbelievable Ramos and Compeans testimony had to be for the jury to vote in fravor of the drug mules story?

[Neidermeyer]

“Taking the word of a drug smuggler over two agents?”
***************************************

Their defense arguments were restricted by the gov’t (Sutton) ,, the jury never heard that the “witness” was a drug smuggler, it was suppressed.

[Thombo2]

No...Please enlighten me #48:)

[RJL]

Do you know how contradictory and unbelievable Ramos and Compeans testimony had to be for the jury to vote in favor of the drug mules story?

US Attorney Johnny Sutton or his assistant(s) took the illegal drug smugglers side and told a tale they knew to be false, that this was a one time thing, done only to help pay for medical help for his poor mother.

Do you know how such lies, told by a US Attorney sways a jury?