Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob J
Do you know how contradictory and unbelievable Ramos and Compeans testimony had to be for the jury to vote in favor of the drug mules story?

US Attorney Johnny Sutton or his assistant(s) took the illegal drug smugglers side and told a tale they knew to be false, that this was a one time thing, done only to help pay for medical help for his poor mother.

Do you know how such lies, told by a US Attorney sways a jury?

96 posted on 11/25/2007 8:37:01 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: RJL

After the trial several jury members stated they didn’t put any weight at all on OAD’s testimony but convivted on the cover up and contradictory testimony of R&C.

Anyway, it was OAD who testified to these facts, not the prosecutors. They may have used these statements in closing arguments but that is their job to sum up testimony and evidence at that time.

It’s not up to the attorneys to make decisions as to the the veracity of statements made at trial, only to present them and let the jury figure out who is lying and not and what weight to put on any single piece of evidence.


192 posted on 11/26/2007 10:28:22 AM PST by Bob J (For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, there is one striking at its root)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson