Posted on 11/22/2007 6:09:56 AM PST by decimon
I saw JFK alive and dead on the same day. I knew the docs who worked on Kennedy at Parkland. I saw the Oswald family enroute to view his body at the Parkland morgue. The Warren Commission was correct in it’s conclusions! Conspiracist? No, I was a resident physician at Parkland.
Exactly right. But "they" didn't want him, having discovered what a loose cannon he was. Oswald hoped to gain their acceptance by offing Kennedy as a favor to Castro.
 Lee Harvey Oswald distributing literature on behalf of the Fair Play For Cuba Committee, August 9, 1963. The headline on the leaflet reads "Hands off Cuba!"(photo taken by Michael O,Connor)
|
Yeah, it’s extremely difficult to prove a negative. Troofers of any stripe just through preposterous hypotheses and defy “deniers” to disprove them. The game isn’t worth the candle.
Any evidence that doesn’t conform to their preconceived ideas is rejected, belittled and dismissed, the mere allegations conforming to their world view are embraced as Holy Writ, beyond questioning.
Until 9/11, the JFK assassination was the greatest well spring of conspricacy theories.
The entire scenario has markings of higher level operative Masonry involvement. For this reason, we probably will never know the truth behind it in this world, but for this very reason, respect legitimate authority, let them play their hand and let God provide perfect justice for all, simply through faith in Christ.
Could you give a tip as to where one would begin to follow that as a source?
I’m not arguing, merely curious. It doesn’t bother me to read many a CT including those from Tex Marrs or Brandon Files, but in the long run I suspect their faith might not be a soundly placed as should be....
Source? We don’t need no steenkin’ source. BTW, I was in Germany that day, nowhere near Dallas.
A fiction writer who’s book plot was about frameing someone and he had his main character equiped with Carcano would be told by his publisher to change piece of fiction or his book might flop. Also it’s hard to see a knowlegable person choosing the Carcano. Don’t pass the smell test to me.
Crimony.....Get over it, people.
It knocks JFK back into the seat, while the back of his head gets blown off. Jackie, who is right next to him, is seen leaning over at the moment of impact. She is not hurled into the back seat.
Simple physics confirms that a shot from behind and up could never create such force. It would be the opposite.
Other than that Mrs Kennedy, how was Dallas??
On my way out... ; )
After reading all of this, I think I am going to throw up.
There are many who think LHO was a "stringer" for the CIA.
He’s still dead right ?
Or are their JFK sightings in the book depository maybe he’s reading the latest edition of harry potter or ann coulters Godless
May he somehow rest in peace ...
Even so, the number of shots fired in the film were not hard to hear, as they identified both shots, and possibly a third, if one was only an echo. (The questionable one on the Police Department recorder picked up from the motorcyle cop's microphone, which was inadvertently left keyed.)
But I wasn't there, so can't speak with authority. Just guessing like everyone else. The number of theories we have on this is comensurately higher depending on who has the most information and how well they are able to integrate it.
I think it's humorous, personally. Everyone thinking they have better logic or have secret info nobody else has. Heh.
Your mis-use of the phrase says much about your theory.
The Stonecutters did it, huh?
I was in Dallas a few years ago, and visited Dealey (sp?) plaza. It was surprizing, to me anyway, how small of an area that is, from the book depository, to the “grassy noll” and the fence. seems like it was about 60 -70 yards.
seems like a much bigger area when looking at the videos.
Do you think Roselli was one of the players in JFK’s murder?
Now as far as how Jean Hill is treated: I don’t read as challenging her claims made in ‘63 as much as how they changed later. For example:
In ‘63, she only heard shots from the knoll and saw a man running from the book depository. Later, she saw Badge Man on the knoll and it was Jack Ruby running from the building. Plus, SS agents tried to pressure into saying that there were only 3 shots - an incident not mentioned at all in ‘63. I’d say, those changes are suspicious
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.