[Sapper26]

While discussing conspiracies in the past, I’ve noticed the trend to label contradicting evidence as “disinformation” without ever giving a reason why. So, I apologize if I was overly sarcastic earlier.

Now as far as how Jean Hill is treated: I don’t read as challenging her claims made in ‘63 as much as how they changed later. For example:

In ‘63, she only heard shots from the knoll and saw a man running from the book depository. Later, she saw Badge Man on the knoll and it was Jack Ruby running from the building. Plus, SS agents tried to pressure into saying that there were only 3 shots - an incident not mentioned at all in ‘63. I’d say, those changes are suspicious

[Sudetenland]

Now we’ve got the SchutzStaffel involved? I thought they were all in Argentina.