[RichInOC]

I support keeping those guys flying...preferably with a trebuchet.

[tennteacher]

Clinton- the gift that keeps on giving.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

OK. Award them one penny, marinated in pig stool.

[Bahbah]

The motion to dismiss is pro-forma. It is filed as a matter of course. If there are any issues of fact to be tried, it is denied.

This judge may be a good judge or just awful, but this is no test of that This is a correct decision in my opinion.

[I see my hands]

What this teaches is that prudent words and actions by passengers and crew are insufficient to deter terror threats.

[Jeff Chandler]

On New Year's Day evening not long after the imams pulled this stunt, I was at U.S. Airways headquarters to take a project photo for my web design client, Jen Electric, who had done the electrical work on the building. I had gone there a month before during the day, but the building faced north and the glare from the sun made it impossible to get a good shot.

Anyway, Homeland Security showed up and detained me until they ran a check on me and determined I was not with Al Qaida.

So, yes, Homeland Security is on the job.

Here's the shot I got and eventually had printed 33" x 22" and laminated to hang on Jen's corporate headquarters wall:

From Jen Electric Website.

[cricket]

In the past. . .and more recent, as well; when outrageous 'judging' occurs; have asked 'Fox' to please - at least identify the political 'persuasion' or by whose appointment, these Judges hold their jobs. so as to remind and/or educate more people on the realities and consequences of Liberalism. Too many 'spades' not being called - so to speak.

Only occasionally, do they go there. Am tired of hearing 'where does this craziness come from' or what was he thinking by doing this - when we know too well, precisely how and by what means, these rediculous and dangerous decisions arrive.

We know. . .but many, many more need to hear and think it. . .and then for sure; they can 'know' it as well.

And none of 'us' should ever forget it either.

[CharlesWayneCT]

Showing how the “gotcha” game is played, to counter some Fred supporters in a separate thread——

This judge was confirmed without a roll call vote, in August of 1996. That means that Fred Thompson consented to this woman being a judge. So, by the logic of some Fred supporters, Fred is personally responsible for this ruling by the judge he allowed to be confirmed by his consent to the confirmation.

I hope that nobody here takes that seriously, and I hope this adds a bit of sanity to the wild and baseless accusations being thrown around by others.

Back to your judge-bashing.

[TheThinker]

This makes me boiling mad.