I tend to diagree. The grammar of the sentence assumes that "individuals", in this case those not affiliated with any state regulated militia, *have* Second Amendment rights. The very thing that DC argued against before the Court of Appeals.
violate the Second Amendment rights of individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia
Ask yourself who "Second Amendment rights" in that sentence are said to belong to (are "of"). The answer "individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia."
I don't who wrote that sentence, but at least the minimum number of Justices signed off on it, and I find it very promising indeed.
I see yer point.......waiting......nervous.
Hope ya had a peaceful thanksgiving day EG !
Stay safe....