Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DCPatriot

It would have been simpler from the start...to let everyone have as many weapons as they want...and tax bullets at $12 per round. We never would have entered into guns or no gun argument...and real owners would have bought just a half-box a year of ammo for their weapon to protect the house. Those guns who wanted automatic weapons...would have been pouring $$$ into ammo left and right...pushing revenue dollars into each state’s economy.


107 posted on 11/22/2007 9:36:35 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice
It would have been simpler from the start...to let everyone have as many weapons as they want...and tax bullets at $12 per round. We never would have entered into guns or no gun argument...and real owners would have bought just a half-box a year of ammo for their weapon to protect the house. Those guns who wanted automatic weapons...would have been pouring $$$ into ammo left and right...pushing revenue dollars into each state’s economy.

__________________________________________

How very Democrat of you. There is nothing in the constitition that says the right to keep and bear arms islimited only to those needed for defense against burglary. The intention is to provide a well armed citizenry as a defense against the over reaches of government.

Your solution is akin to the old soviet idea of allowing only fowling pieces.

120 posted on 11/22/2007 11:14:38 AM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson