;oD
Posted on 11/21/2007 4:15:55 AM PST by tlb
.. the New York senator had touted her own know-how, saying that “there is one job we can’t afford on-the-job training for — that’s the job of our next president.”
Obama offered a zinger feathered with amused disdain: “My understanding was that she wasn’t Treasury secretary in the Clinton administration, so I don’t know exactly what experiences she’s claiming.”
It took him nine months, but he finally found the perfect pitch to make a trenchant point.
She went on some first lady jaunts. But she was certainly not, as her top Iowa supporter, former governor Tom Vilsack claimed yesterday on MSNBC, “the face of the administration in foreign affairs.”
She was a top adviser who had a Nixonian bent for secrecy and a knack for hard-core politicking.
Getting ahead through connections is common in life. But Hillary cloaks her nepotism in feminism.
“She hasn’t accomplished anything on her own since getting admitted to Yale Law,” wrote Joan Di Cola. All Hillary is, is Mrs. Clinton.
President Bush is not so enamored of Obama’s foreign policy judgment. He gave a plug to Hillary on ABC News last night, calling her a “formidable candidate,” even under pressure, who “understands the klieg lights.”
Hillary pounced, knowing that her chief rival’s foreign policy résumé is as slender as his physique, once more conjuring a childish Obama. She brazenly borrowed Republican talking points, even though she accused John Edwards of “throwing mud” that was “right out of the Republican playbook.”
“With all due respect,” she told a crowd in Iowa. “I don’t think living in a foreign country between the ages of 6 and 10 is foreign policy experience.”
But is living in the White House between the ages of 45 and 53 foreign policy experience?
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Rules!!!
It simply amazes me that so many moonbat leftists hate Hillary, when she’s clearly got the ability to win and give them the socialist utopia they want. It’s a good thing, don’t get me wrong. I just don’t understand how they can’t see it and why they hate her in spite of it.
The enemy of my enemy is still my enemy...
But you go girl.
;oD
What’s up with the Bushes? Are they trying to kill her by praising her?
Rules are rules!
Maybe Mo still sees HRC as the “other woman.”
It’s too bad a true independent can’t get to ask a question at one of the democrat debates. Like:
“Mrs. Clinton, you claim to have foreign policy experience by virtue of your eight years as ‘co-president.’” So, in response to one of many terrorist attacks during those years, was it your idea or your husband’s to bomb an aspirin factory? Did you lobby for a different response—perhaps bombing a Tylenol factory—while Usama bin Laden was allowed to roam free?”
How many presidents had prior experience as a president?
MoDo has some big feet there!
(Amazing that she can fit them in her mouth so often.)
That said, I do understand why the moonbats hate her. She is a realist driven more by personal ambition than ideology. Her foreign policy in particular would be closer to Bush's than most here would admit. Bill would have gone into Iraq too if the polls supported it.
George Bush is now fully controlled by the golbalist crowd, so he’s only concerned that the US eventually go to war with Iran - and Hillary is the most likely choice to continue that policy, as she’s firmly in the globalist orbit too.
(Notice also that neither one wants to do anything about the southern border, another hallmark of the globalists).
Kinda like a Cargo Cult for Clintonistas...
Kinda like with the knock 'em down dolls at the carnival. If you hit the fluff hard enough, they'll go over.
Hillary’s right. We need a president with experience in elephant-riding.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.