To: Miss Didi
I’m going to guess that this is about “coke”. If this was just a marijuana story...no bid deal. But if you get into snorting coke, then we’re talking harder drugs...and more of a scandal. This has got to be a preemptive strike.
To: LexHoskin
“Im going to guess that this is about coke. If this was just a marijuana story...no bid deal. But if you get into snorting coke, then were talking harder drugs...and more of a scandal. This has got to be a preemptive strike.”
This is probabbly what Novak was talking about. Now Hillary can’t bring out this dirt.
59 posted on
11/20/2007 10:56:28 AM PST by
trublu
To: LexHoskin
If Hillary is going after Obama on cocaine, that is a hugely risky strategy. The Clintons allowed brother Roger to snort cocaine in the White House. And I know a couple of Bill’s suppliers from back in the 70s.
85 posted on
11/20/2007 11:03:20 AM PST by
HAL9000
(Fred Thompson/Mike Huckabee 2008)
To: LexHoskin; wagglebee
This has been well known for a long time, Hitlery has something else. Obama is just trying to use this to deflect attention.
Or to get attention. Remember we are "Oprah Nation" where a quick visit to her couch to repent and shed a few tears will make him even more endearing...no matter what scandal Mrs. Clinton has up her sleeve.
88 posted on
11/20/2007 11:03:57 AM PST by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: LexHoskin
"Im going to guess that this is about coke. If this was just a marijuana story...no bid deal. But if you get into snorting coke, then were talking harder drugs...and more of a scandal. This has got to be a preemptive strike."
It's a big deal for republican candidates like Bush in 2000. No big deal for Obama or "nose like a vacuum cleaner" Bill Clinton.
181 posted on
11/20/2007 4:43:40 PM PST by
boop
(Who doesn't love poison pot pies?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson