Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/20/2007 10:39:23 AM PST by Hydroshock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Hydroshock; Calpernia; cbkaty; Nervous Tick; ex-Texan; RockinRight; NVDave; Neidermeyer; ...

Economy/Credit/Housing Issues Ping List

If you want on or off this list let me know.


2 posted on 11/20/2007 10:40:25 AM PST by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

Next they’ll tax air.


3 posted on 11/20/2007 10:41:37 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
This is the best a FINANCIAL network can do? A national sales tax is NOT the same as a VAT tax.

Sheeesssshhhhh..........

6 posted on 11/20/2007 10:42:21 AM PST by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

Uh, that would be ON TOP OF the income tax we already pay? No doubt. When did they put Gov. O’Malley of Maryland in charge of the Treasury?


7 posted on 11/20/2007 10:43:25 AM PST by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
I am barely surviving now....

National Sales Tax....call me homeless.

10 posted on 11/20/2007 10:46:10 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (RIP Eric Medlen. You will be missed.../ Get well Soon John Force!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

Further proof that the whole “Fair Tax” is something dreamed up by the Scientologists (or the guy that wrote “The Wizard of Oz”). National Sales Taxes are ALWAYS levied on top of existing taxes.

A Flat Tax is the way to go. Unlike this “Fair Tax” it actually has a successful track record in over 30 countries so far. Beginning with Hong Kong in the ‘fifties and now spreading over the countries of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.


11 posted on 11/20/2007 10:46:44 AM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

String the bastards up.


12 posted on 11/20/2007 10:47:05 AM PST by skepsel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

Sounds like a fair tax.


13 posted on 11/20/2007 10:47:47 AM PST by Paladin2 (We don't fix the problem, we fix the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
...The U.S. currently has no national sales tax, also known as a value added tax, ...

News to me.

14 posted on 11/20/2007 10:48:00 AM PST by SGCOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

A sales tax, on top of the income tax? No.

Not just no, but hell no!


15 posted on 11/20/2007 10:48:28 AM PST by NeoCaveman ("Don't doubt me" - El Rushbo, alternative tagline: Hunter/Pissant 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

They can discuss it until they are blue in the face. Anyone voting for this will end their career in politics.

Idiots.

What is it about ‘Republican and Conservative’ do they not understand?


18 posted on 11/20/2007 10:49:38 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
Put the tax on the high-end sales market. It’s the only growth sector and the higher price would improve purchaser’s conspicuous consumption.
19 posted on 11/20/2007 10:50:12 AM PST by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
The tax would be one option to help offset revenue lost from lowering corporate taxes.

Because heaven forbid they actually CUT SPENDING and fire some useless bureaucrat overseeing the managers of scientists studying bear DNA. Can't have that, now can we?

21 posted on 11/20/2007 10:57:00 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

If you eliminate the corporate taxes, and replace them with a sales tax, there are some advantages.

First, it means U.S. corporations are taxed less. That lowers their expenses. Either they can lower the price of goods (offsetting the sales tax), return it to shareholders, or use it to grow.

It also makes them more competitive in the global marketplace.

Meanwhile, we would pay the sales tax not just on items purchased from U.S. companies, but on EVERY item from all companies. So in effect it would be taxing foreign corporations for the business they do in this country. Again, helping U.S. companies who currently share the entire burden of taxes while the foreign companies skate.

There are problems with a national sales tax. It is regressive (probably not an issue amongst us here), and it is a new tax. But we are already paying the corporate tax through the price of goods and services.

I’m not saying I support this idea, just that I can see some positive effects. The negatives have been covered here pretty well.


22 posted on 11/20/2007 10:58:14 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

I would LOVE a national sales tax if, and only if, they abolished the income tax.

Getting taxed on both ends is insulting - at the very least.


24 posted on 11/20/2007 11:03:50 AM PST by RobRoy (Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in 1938.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
I think politicians miss the point of lowering taxes. You are not supposed to lower them in one area and then raise them somewhere else to make up the difference. Don't you wish we, as individuals, had this power? Simply tax your employer so you get paid more. If he complains about high wages tax him for letting you park in his parking area and cut wages. That should make him happy./SAR

Politicians, the scum of the earth. Why we actually think we need them, I don't know. Citizens who take turns at the helm should be the order of the day and I believe that was roughly the idea when the constitution was penned. We have allowed a whole class of professional power brokers to take over this country and have allowed it almost from the start of this government but we keep making it worse instead of fixing it.

27 posted on 11/20/2007 11:08:13 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

This article seems to be equating a national sales tax with a VAT. As I understand it a VAT applies at each stage of the manufacturing process, while a national sales tax might apply only at the point of final consumption.

VAT’s are for countries with greedy, lowlife governments that would strangle their citizenry for a few extra bucks - no wonder it’s getting support in Washington.

I think, if enacted, American may be going down for the count. :(


28 posted on 11/20/2007 11:08:22 AM PST by The Duke (I have met the enemy, and he is named 'Apathy'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

Perhaps I’m wrong, but I always thought there was quite a difference between a retail sales tax, and a value added, or VAT tax. This article says they’re the same thing.


30 posted on 11/20/2007 11:16:08 AM PST by Red Boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

Here we go once again - doing favors for “corporations” at the expense of the general public. If the proposed corporate tax rate change will result in a shortfall, please explain to me why it becomes incumbent upon the taxpayer to make up the difference?

Corporations and their unaccountability are the among the biggest reasons this nation is crumbling as it is, why should we do them any more favors when ultimately they’ll just export their factories out of this country anyway?

Blatant ignorance is running rampant in DC...


34 posted on 11/20/2007 11:31:57 AM PST by retr0 (He who argues with a fool is an even greater fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

If it’s to subisidize the lowering of coporate taxes, then it had better ONLY be charged on sales to corporations and not private citizens!


35 posted on 11/20/2007 11:35:50 AM PST by BMIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson