Posted on 11/20/2007 10:34:03 AM PST by Reagan Man
A revitalized Thompson has an honest, clear, straightforward message of economic freedom and problem solving.
An energetic and forceful Fred Thompson sat down with me last week on Kudlow and Company to talk politics and the economy. The former Tennessee senator was in good form -- more animated than I've seen him, and definitely a different person than the one I interviewed six months ago.
I asked him about Dick Armey, the former Republican House majority leader. Armey recently predicted that Hillary Clinton will be the next president, reasoning that the GOP has departed from the first principles of limited government and lower taxes. Armey said budget overspending and the proliferating corruption of earmarks are what led to the landslide defeat of Republicans a year ago. To date, Dick Armey is unimpressed with the circa 2007 GOP message.
And Thompson agreed. He said, "If we don't tend to business we are going to be in big trouble. Pendulum's swinging against us. We are down in the polls. Independents are leaning the other way [where they] used to lean with us. So we've got to . . . adhere to the principles that made us a great party and a great nation."
That was a strong dose of honesty and self-examination. Good for Fred Thompson.
Speaking of limited government and budget overspending, I asked if a President Thompson would veto the $300 billion earmark-pocked pork-barrel farm bill now before Congress. He called this legislation "disgraceful," noted that it wouldn't even help small family farms, and that it would block the expansion of world free trade.
When I asked him about Warren Buffett, the famous investor billionaire, Thompson turned up the heat. In testimony before the Senate last week, Buffett advocated a whole series of tax hikes, such as an increase in the death tax, higher capital gains and dividend taxes, and more taxes on private partnerships, hedge funds, and private-equity buyout firms. Thompson labeled this policy dead wrong. He said Buffett is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the Democratic party. He argued that the wealth of the government is the not the same thing as the wealth of nations, and that history proves lower tax rates promote economic growth.
And he said Hillary Clinton and the other Democratic candidates are blind to all this. He noted that the top 5 percent of income earners now pay 60 percent of all tax collections; that the tax code is progressive enough; that there's plenty of economic mobility in the country; that for those who have fallen behind, the problem is poor education, not tax rates; and that America is the freest, most prosperous, most powerful nation in the history of the world.
We talked about his controversial Social Security reform plan that would slow down future benefits by indexing them to inflation rather than wages, while providing for add-on private savings accounts with a government match, much like the system for 401(k)s.
Lower benefits? Isn't that the proverbial third-rail of politics? Not according to Mr. Thompson. He said big problems ought to be tackled: "If you can't do the right thing, say what you believe and what everybody really basically knows, why do it? Why bother? Life is too short for the aggravation."
Thompson wants to tell the truth about Social Security and force everyone else in the game to respond. This issue is a real character-building definer for Fred Thompson. No one else on the campaign trail, in either party, is willing to discuss Social Security in such frank terms.
But that's the revitalized Fred Thompson. The more I challenged him, the more animated he became. He simply refused to stand down.
Some people say Thompson doesn't have the fire in his belly to go the distance. I don't think that's true. And I'm not picking or endorsing any candidates here. But Thompson has an honest, clear, straightforward message of economic freedom and problem solving.
Then I brought up the CNBC/Wall Street Journal debate of a few weeks ago, when Thompson slammed Rudy Giuliani. I asked if he intended to continue to pound Giuliani on the campaign trail. He said, "I haven't pounded all day." I asked, What about yesterday? He said, "Well, we're pointing out some policy differences. [Giuliani] believes in federal funding for abortion. He went to court to stop our bill outlawing sanctuary cities. He's never met a gun-control bill he didn't like."
A sharp-edged Fred Thompson.
Can he win? His campaign strategists told me they are pouring tons of money into Iowa advertising. They see a strong opportunity for a Thompson surge in the state, undermining Romney and inflicting damage on Giuliani. Walking off the set, Thompson told me this election will be about peace and prosperity. And he intends to fight hard.
He sounds good, but faces an uphill battle.
hahaha. Whatever.
True, but this is a little different. Spamming the Internet is not a cool or mature thing for a presidential candidate to do.
I love all these “evaluations of the campaigns” lately. Which book on politics did you write again? I missed it I think. My point is, who cares about “the campaign” IF the message is right? Listen to the PEOPLE and what they are saying, not how and when they are saying it. Not when they got into the race, or how “late” everyone seems to think they are. That’s nothing but whitewash and anyone with a lick of common sense can see it.
Then again, there’s an awful lot of non-common sense people out there trying to tell us all how to think.
Excellent piece!
BUMP
After the pounding Fred took in October from the mainstream media and GOP malcontents. A significant rebound just might be in the cards. Some Republicans got cold feet and ran to Mike Huckabee. Others ran to Ron Paul. Two candidates with no chance of getting the nomination.
If I know Rooty, he’s loving every minute of it. Whether it was his intention or not, the obvious split among conservatives continues to be working in his favor. But even though Rooty`s still leading and pulling down 25%-30% of support, there is still 70%-75% who don’t support him.
If conservatives want to knock Rooty off, they must unite around one candidate. I see Fred as that candidate.
No doubt we must unite, but aorund who is still being debated.
Tagline change; thanks.
The message doesn't matter if it is not being communicated. The worst thing a political camp can do is to start believing their own propaganda. The second worst mistake is to overestimate the intelligence and discernment of the voters.
Yeah, but it’s that good, especially as “no fire in the belly” is the MSM mantra.
Heh! :)
.
Same thing here, Fred knows the combat bit in a campaign. He knew he was behind the conventionally armed players so he has been playing a wholly different form of warfare. Like the Torpedo, he is letting them close the distance while he makes steady gains. He is letting them get closer to the actual vote all the while he is right there ready to pounce when it is too late for them to counter, to arm themselves against the new assault.
He did it years ago in the Senate race. He will do it again. It will will either be the greatest strategic campaign play of all time or a complete flop, but with everything I have read on Fred, I am betting on the former, not the latter...
Yee
Haw
About damned time!
Iraq won't be an issue because demobilization will start next year and it takes a long time to ship that stuff out on freighters. Whatever Iraq doesn't want to buy. Like 400 ton cranes and other very heavy military hardware. There will be bad accidents just doing this.
And putting a NYC Mayor against a NY Senator for President just isn't going to happen.
Is that what you said after throwing a cherry bomb under you're sleeping wife's beach chair? My Navy uncle did that. Just once.
LOL!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.