Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
See post #19.

"Covering their butts"? You betcha. It's what government types do best.

And I can hardly wait to see the rhetorical BS that we can expect to come pouring out from the political left and its media lackeys. It's going to pile up so fast, you'll need wings to stay above it.

It's going to be fun.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

27 posted on 11/20/2007 10:25:20 AM PST by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Joe Brower

Be Ever Vigilant!


67 posted on 11/20/2007 10:52:12 AM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower; Old_Professor
It would appear to me it is possible their choicely verbiage of “....violate the Second Amendment rights of individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia...” is an indication of their actual acknowledgment of the Constitutional right of gun ownership absent any state affiliation of the individual. That said, there's hope DC's infringements might not survive the SCOTUS battle.

What think ye?

104 posted on 11/20/2007 12:06:20 PM PST by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower

(From a friend)

The “Supremes” are going to have to determine what the meaning of “is, is”!

Does the term “the people”, used so widely throughout the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution, mean a collective right or, does it mean an individual right? Should the “Supremes” rule that the term means a collective right, in the context of the Second Amendment, then hang on to your hats, folks, as this will be taken as license to limit or remove all of your individual rights. They, and you, simply cannot have it both ways, as Bubba so stated in “It depends on what the meaning of is, is!”

Read and understand the full meaning of this case. This issue is a real slippery slope. ALL of your “so called” rights hinge on the outcome of this ruling! The ultimate outcome of this ruling WILL effect you all! For those of you anti-gunners, fence straddlers and side liners out there, who think that it is only about owning handguns, you better think again. If the “Supremes” rule against us (We, the people) it won’t be only the “gun owners” of America whose “OX WILL BE GORED” it will be all of us (We, the people!), including you!!! And remember, this is our friends and neighbors in the Democrat Party that are pushing this whole thing!!

Maybe it is just time to get this whole matter resolved, once and for all!

Good luck to us all in this case and in the next election!

Open links below for further info.

US Supreme Court Case news article http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8T1J9K80&show_article=1

And, for those of you who don’t remember your history lessons, or were simply never taught them in the first place:

US Constitution on line web site http://www.usconstitution.net/

Declaration of Independence http://www.usconstitution.net/declar.html

US Constitution http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html


152 posted on 11/21/2007 6:55:34 AM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson