Welcome to FR....
Most girls who get pregnant already know about birth control. They just refuse to use it. If the guy refuses to use a condom, what’s the girl going to say? No? If she could do that, they wouldn’t be talking about a condom.
Good job! And welcome to FR!!
You know the destruction of marriage and family has always been a plank regarding genocide.
It’s usually implemented at the same time children are killed or the public’s told there’s overpopulation.
See Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hitler
bump
Question: I saw the Flickr link in your FR profile. How does what you wrote jive with what you wear? It seems like they are contradictory.
P.C. is not only affecting girls health...it is affecting the health of the entire country!
#3 and the following paragraphs seem like the may be relevant here...
Indeed! I think there are three main reasons arranged marriages have a high success rate:
1) The couple goes into the marriage without unrealistically high expectations.
2) The families dont select based on lust.
3) In the societies that practice arranged marriage it is very likely that the first sexual partner is the new spouse.
By the time they have worked their way through the Kama Sutra (for example) they are pretty thoroughly imprinted on each other.
Contrast that to the dozens or even scores of partners the typical bride and groom may have here, the sense of bonding is so blurred and degraded that it cant act as a glue to hold them together.
414 posted on 11/14/2007 2:09:49 PM PST by null and void
I feel so sorry for girls now days because they skip the romance.
This is the goal of the Sex Positive agenda. End ALL moral judgements over sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s).
Sex Positive proponents oppose abstinence not because "it doesn't work" but because they see sexual pleasure as a birthright and seek to see everyone sexually active at every age. They see abstinence as "unhealthy" because it is a supression of sexual desires.
I think that it is positive.org that has a campaign called "just say YES" because there are too many stuffy adults already telling kids what they can and cannot do.
The Sex Positive agenda has been defined by Kinsey, Reich, and feminists.
Definitely Not Guilty.
A reasoned basis for this statement is probably too much to ask.
The following is a simple natural law argument for monogamy and post-marital sex.
1) Looking at the bodies of men and women, it's obvious that they play complementary roles in the process of bringing new human life into the world. This is the way nature meant children to come into the world, hence the term, "reproductive system" or "genitals."
2) No reasonable person would argue that children are better off raised by anyone other than their biological parents. Nevertheless, there are some unreasonable people who do. These people need to become acquainted with the data regarding the rate of sexual abuse by step-parents.
3) And if it's not obvious that children are generally better off being raised by both of their natural parents, then again, I would point them to the sociological data regarding the effect of divorce on children.
4) The act of sexual intercouse is pleasurable and ordered by nature toward procreation. It is also unitive, as common sense, common experience, and current scientific data affirms.
5) It follows then that this unitive aspect of intercourse is ordered by nature toward the unity of the man and woman for their benefit(4), and also for the benefit of the children who may issue from the act (2).
6) Moreover, nature intends this unitive bonding to be lifelong, since the children of parents bonded together for life are generally happier and healthier than children raised otherwise (3).
7) If one or the other members of the bonded couple engages in intercourse with a third person, then new natural bonds will be formed, weakening the original bond which nature intended, to the detriment of the original couple and their children (5).
8) Since nature intends intercourse to unify the couple for life, for the benefit of the couple and the benefit of children which may issue from the act, no man or woman should engage in intercourse without having made a lifetime commitment to the other partner.
8) Therefore, intercourse outside of a lifetime commitment is harmful and wrong.
Check it out... very informative!!
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Curious name for a website. "Go Ask Alice" is the (true) diary of a young girl who "choose" to be a drug user and what her life was like as a drug user. It has a curious ending which you can see if you highlight the following:
"Alice"'s final entry indicates that she's going to get on with her life now. Ironically, the epilogue notes that within a couple of weeks of making that entry, after she's cured, she died of a drug overdose.
Check your FReepmail.
She hooks up with Jerry Lee Lewis, and bang, game on.
Thanks for the “welcome” messages! Any concerned parents out there (or college students, for that matter) should really think about buying a copy of “Unprotected.” I was shocked by some of the things I learned from it!