[Pistolshot]

Sorry, needing a SUPER majority for an Amendment to pass is not going to happen. It didn't happen when the Repubs had control of BOTH houses. It's not going to happen anytime soon. If you wait on an Amendment, MORE unborn will die waiting on the process.

To that end, it's time to change what can be changed to influence change. That means constructionist judges on the SCOTUS to make that change begin.

The objective of overturning RvW is not going to happen with an Amendment, it WILL happen by sending it back to the states where eliminating or writing law that will work for everyone can be instituted.

We want abortion on demand stopped. You and I see different ways to get to that point.

The way through the SCOTUS and ultimately the ballot box will be the winner.

[AFA-Michigan]

Apparently, you didn’t actually read post 103.

To make sure we understand each other, answer this:

Do you oppose a Human Life Amendment, as Fred does?

Or do you simply believe it’s currently unachievable?

There’s a difference.

Once again, why falsely paint it as an either-or choice.

The truly pro-life position is to support both repeal of Roe AND, eventually, a universal guarantee of the Right to Life in all 50 states.

Nothing about being pro-life requires you to pick one or the other.

Only trying to justify Thompson’s position requires you to pick one and dis the other.