Apparently, you didn’t actually read post 103.
To make sure we understand each other, answer this:
Do you oppose a Human Life Amendment, as Fred does?
Or do you simply believe it’s currently unachievable?
There’s a difference.
Once again, why falsely paint it as an either-or choice.
The truly pro-life position is to support both repeal of Roe AND, eventually, a universal guarantee of the Right to Life in all 50 states.
Nothing about being pro-life requires you to pick one or the other.
Only trying to justify Thompson’s position requires you to pick one and dis the other.
The best path, and the one that will cost the leat amount of lives yet unborn is to return the issue BACK to the states where the voters through the process of decision at the ballot bbox decide what should and should not be allowable.
And Fred doesn't oppose it, he feel it is an unreachable goal....as I do.
And supporting a Personhood at Conception bill, which does not equire a Const. Am.-DNA evidence is clear-distinct human life exists in the womb.