Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: boop
Somebody tell NASA. They just adjusted their numbers to say this is completely false.

The statement is correct for global temperatures. The NASA corrections were for U.S. temperatures.

47 posted on 11/19/2007 8:57:41 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: cogitator

You are correct, and also YOU should state that there are VERY FEW temperature stations with ACCURATE data from places other than EUROPE and the USA. Using inaccurate temperature data from other places skews results. Garbagein=Garbage out. Also, last Sothern Hemisphere winter showed largest recorded area of SEA ICE, and new Sat data is showing INCREASING mass of Antarctic ice, which MORE than offsets losses in Greenland.


51 posted on 11/19/2007 9:18:43 AM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: cogitator
"The NASA corrections were for U.S. temperatures."

Now I'm really confused. So Nasa's data that they just changed said the hottest years in a century were in the 1930's ONLY in the US? I had no idea there was isolated heating in only one country.

63 posted on 11/19/2007 11:12:44 AM PST by boop (Who doesn't love poison pot pies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson