Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cogitator
"The NASA corrections were for U.S. temperatures."

Now I'm really confused. So Nasa's data that they just changed said the hottest years in a century were in the 1930's ONLY in the US? I had no idea there was isolated heating in only one country.

63 posted on 11/19/2007 11:12:44 AM PST by boop (Who doesn't love poison pot pies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: boop

The IPCC probably left out NASA’s REVISED figures because they did not fit the ‘consensus’. Just like Mann’s famous hockey stick graph, which in an earlier IPCC report was the ‘proof’ they relied on to foist the Global Warming charade upon the unsuspecting citizenry of the world. Of course you won’t find Mann’s graph ANYWHERE in the new report because it was shown to be a FRAUD.


64 posted on 11/19/2007 11:41:45 AM PST by milwguy (........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: boop
So Nasa's data that they just changed said the hottest years in a century were in the 1930's ONLY in the US?

This was confusing (and it wasn't helped by inaccurate media reports). I wrote this to try and help FR to sort it out:

A little perspective on the U.S. and global temperature records

66 posted on 11/19/2007 12:01:36 PM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: boop

Sorry! I realized that I had done an update. See post 69 in the thread linked in post 67 of THIS thread.


68 posted on 11/19/2007 12:06:50 PM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson