Posted on 11/17/2007 10:07:29 AM PST by wagglebee
Just days after Virginia Governor Timothy M. Kaine announced that he will cut state funding for abstinence education programs, a new study affirmed that such initiatives in the state do work.
The study, which will be published in the Jan./Feb. 2008 issue of the American Journal of Health Behavior, shows that programs by the state health departments Virginia Abstinence Education Initiative resulted in a significant reduction in teen sexual initiation.
The Institute for Research and Evaluation evaluated the impact of the programs by examining the behavior of seventh-graders from five different Virginia schools. The study concluded that those students receiving abstinence education were about one-half (45.7 percent) as likely to initiate sexual activity as students who did not receive abstinence education.
Earlier this week, the governor cut off state funding for abstinence education programs after Planned Parenthood of Virginia lobbied for the change in policy.
Through his communications director, Kaine cited his desire to fund programs that are evidenced-based.
He also announced that Virginia will now offer "more comprehensive" sex education programs, reported the Washington Post.
But supporters of abstinence education have called the governors decision a mistake and say they hope the new report will prompt him to reconsider.
"Governor Kaine needs to reconsider his position for the sake of Virginia's teens, said Valerie Huber, executive director of the National Abstinence Education Association, in a statement Wednesday. It is important to make decisions based on the full body of research.
"We hope Governor Kaine will consider this encouraging report, which is yet another confirmation that when young people are provided abstinence education, they abstain!
In a statement Wednesday, Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, also urged Kaine to do his homework before making such a significant decision.
Good policy is based on accurate information and tax funding should favor programs with proven results, she said.
He needs to re-think his decision to cut funding from abstinence programs that work, and re-consider his allegiance to faulty, ineffective comprehensive sex ed programs and the groups that profit from encouraging kids to be sexually active, added Wright.
Huber defended the quality of the abstinence education programs to critics, noting that while they send a strong abstinence message, the initiatives do provide youth information on sexually transmitted diseases and contraception.
"Federal funding for abstinence programs has significantly contributed to the nationwide decline in teen pregnancies and the increase in the percentage of teens that are waiting to have sex in Virginia, and across the United States," said Huber.
Sen. Ken Cuccinelli II (R-Fairfax) told the Washington Post that he will try to get the General Assembly to reverse the governors decision when it convenes in January.
And the leftist media will NEVER report this.
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Can someone please give me a definition of “more comprehensive”?
Why would they report that people still live morally-driven lives, who abstain from having sex?
“Through his communications director, Kaine cited his desire to fund programs that are ‘evidenced-based.’”
If the governor requires empirical evidence that Doing the Right Thing yields the desired result, perhaps he should consider the potential result to the state’s moral and ethical posture - or is that unpopular because it’s not quantifiable in a statistical table?
This question is rhetorical, but ... why would planned parenthood care if there was an abstinence program? Hmmmmm? If I sell cookies, why should I care if you sell cake? Unless, of course, it cuts into my cookie sales.
It’s common sense, really. If the state of Virginia won’t teach it, I recommend that they change the name of their state to Fornicopia.
Condoms on zucchinis.
Guys like him are perverts.
Why would liberals want teens to abstain? That would conflict with their dreams of total sexual liberation, including the glorification of pre-marital sex, adultery, homosexuality and the sexualization of children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.