And the Congressional investigations proved the fuel tank scenario beyond all doubt! And I would absolutely never question Mythbusters.
Funny how people will cling to any explanation as long as it involves something “mysterious.”
The explanatioins for a missile are beyond silly. No Stinger could hit it, and if it did, it would have hit an engine, not a midsection; way out of range; and the “residue” was ONLY consistent with what I call a “pass-through” drone missile-—except no target drone COULD target anything like a plane (remember, it is the target) nor would it veer wildly out of its controlled path without being aborted; nor is there any evidence of a missile test NEEDING a drone; nor is there any radar evidence of a long drone path or a SECOND acquisition missile. In short, it’s just nonsense.