Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS

Thanks for your response. If we’re going to go by Occams Razor the simplest answer is the one that we should follow. The simplest answer is that hundreds of aircraft flying out of Middle-Eastern ports of call in the midst of summer, didn’t develop what an aircraft traveling out of New York did one summer evening. If the parts were faulty, the parts would have been faulty in other aircraft as well. And they weren’t.

The center fuel tank may have blown, but it didn’t blow by natural causes.

Six hundred people in an arc of about 240 degrees saw something fly up in the air to reach the aircraft. Their observations of the location of the specific item they saw, makes it clear they each saw the same thing from different perspectives. And over 600 people seeing this, it defies Occam’s Razor to ignore what so many people saw. The simple answer is, they saw a missile. No convoluted twists of logic and warps of reality are going to change that.

All things considered, the simplest explanation is that these people saw a missile leave the surface of the ocean and hit TWA 800. That’s the end of discussion.

If you folks want to play flights of fantasy, be my guest.


139 posted on 11/20/2007 11:22:13 AM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
Well, you keep dodging the real questions:

1) there were NO ---get it? ZERO---bomb fragments or explosive residue of ANY kind found.

2) the so -called "red residue" was NOT---repeat, NOT---explosive residue. It was only (possibly) evidence of a rocket motor's exhaust. But no rocket parts were ever recovered, and other things could have caused that residue.

3) We have no missile parts, no evidence of explosives, and . . . no missile capable of hitting that plane except one fired by AMERICANS. We have complete denial by the Navy that any vessel capable of firing such a missile was in the area, not to mention the fact that you have not had ONE SINGLE STATEMENT by any sailor or officer that in any way implicates the Navy. That is truly damning for the conspiracy theorists, because NO ORGANIZATION is 100% leak-free . . . unless it didn't happen.

Now, come on. You have to quit ducking real evidence in favor of "logic" and eyewitnesses. If there's one thing we learn from nighttime TV, it is that in crimes, the forensics don't lie.

140 posted on 11/21/2007 4:42:31 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson