Replies

No, that would mean that I didn't look for any. Let me know if you need more help comprehending forum responses.

No, I just assumed that you were serious when you admitted that you'd have to actually look for some evidence to support your claims. In retrospect the fact that you didn't isn't surprising at all.

I agree. It isn't surprising at all because I havn't proposed a theory other than that all options remain on the table. Why would I be looking for proof of something I haven't included in a specific theory.

Are you going on record stating that a shoulder fired SAM couldn't be fired from a surfaced submarine?

My, you are getting wilder and wilder with your theories, aren't you.

Wilder?

Very well, I won't go on record stating a shoulder fired SAM couldn't be fired from a surfaced sub,...

Okay, so much for the "wilder and wilder" theory.

but I will go on record stating that shoulder fires SAMs are not carried on U.S. submarines, for obvious reasons.

Unless unbeknownst to you a special ops training exercise was under way.

I believe that there are a very limited number of players that could have fired a SAM capable of taking down TWA 800. Our military would obvsiously be one of them. Once again, I am keeping ALL options on the table regardless of the odds against one of those options is 'THE' option. The possibility still exists. Until the cause is revealed, we just don't know for certain.

Oh you can stick your 'keeping ALL options open' where the sun don't shine.

No problem, I haven't exactly been respectful in my responses, so that's fair.

What you are saying, and please be man enough to admit it, is that you think it's possible, even probable, that the U.S. Navy shot down TWA 800 and then engaged in a massive coverup. Like I said, with supporters like you the Navy hardly needs enemies.

Once again:

I believe that there are a very limited number of players that could have fired a SAM capable of taking down TWA 800. Our military would obvsiously be one of them. Once again, I am keeping ALL options on the table regardless of the odds against one of those options is 'THE' option. The possibility still exists. Until the cause is revealed, we just don't know for certain.

Well you've said a lot of things. Unfortunately none of them have addressed what actually did take down TWA 800.

If you would like to address that, be my guest.

Let me ask you a question. Do you think the actions of the FBI were problematic at Waco?

Unless unbeknownst to you a special ops training exercise was under way.

Your imagination is running away with you.

Look, believe what you want. Don't let the fact that there is zero evidence to support your wild-ass conspiracy theories get in your way. Go ahead and make up special ops training exercises or super secret weapons systems or rogue Navy ships that go off and shoot down airliners. Whatever makes you happy. But if you also insist that after all of that you still support and respect the U.S. Navy and the other armed forces, well then speaking as a Naval officer I don't want your respect because I doubt its sincerity and I can live without the support of people like you who think that the armed service that I spent almost my entire adult life in could engage in mass-murder and coverups.