Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PetroniusMaximus

There was at least one book written about this incident, speculating that it could have been a navy training (inert) missle, that punctured the cabin, leaving red “missle fuel residue” that the FBI confiscated (except his remnant) and was witnessed by about 286 people including on duty pilots. The FBI further harrassed his gov’t employee wife, etc... I believe that radar shows the missle approaching the plane. I am not saying that I believe that our navy did it, but I do believe that a missle from somewhere took flight 800 down.


10 posted on 11/16/2007 10:38:34 PM PST by matthew fuller (Crop-circles, killer rabbits and UFO'S are caused by GLOBAL WARMING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: matthew fuller

More from Cashill - Pt. 10 on TWA-800:

# Naval presence. Despite at least six credible sightings of a Navy warship off Long Island after 3 p.m. on July 17, the Navy insisted it had none within two hundred miles of the crash site. Under duress in November 1997 the FBI admitted that the Normandy and now three submarines—Trepang, Albuquerque, and Wyoming—were in the “immediate vicinity” of the crash site.

# Mystery ships. For five months the FBI denied the existence of a “surface vessel” that it would later identify as being three miles from the crash site, having a speed between twenty-five and thirty-five knots, and fleeing the scene. The FBI finally admitted its presence but never identified it.


14 posted on 11/16/2007 10:49:53 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: matthew fuller
There was at least one book written about this incident, speculating that it could have been a navy training (inert) missle

We don't shoot "inert" missiles. The "bluebirds" are on the rails when you go in and out of port and to conduct training but cannot launch. White missiles are the warshots, and those are fully functional. It may have been a missile, which I agree, but it was not a Navy missile.

37 posted on 11/17/2007 6:48:30 AM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: matthew fuller
This has been beaten to death. "Mythbusters" proved that in fact a spark could set off a MORE powerful fuel tank explosion under identical circumstances as TWA 800. Radar shows no such thing.

No "inert" missile is used in excercises, and if it was, then a TARGET missile would have been present too (not). Sometimes, as in the JFK assassination, the most obvious, simple facts are the correct ones.

And it's amazing to me how many military-loving Freepers will assume that HUNDREDS of sailors and officers would keep their mouths shut about such an incident had it occurred. Yet not one single "leak" in eight years? come on.

39 posted on 11/17/2007 7:33:39 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: matthew fuller

“There was at least one book written about this incident, speculating that it could have been a navy training (inert) missle”

Just one problem with that, “inert” missiles are just that inert. They can’t fly, they don’t go BOOM either.


183 posted on 11/26/2007 2:29:51 PM PST by 2CAVTrooper (A vote for ron paul in the primary IS a vote for hillary clinton in the general election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson