Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Aren’t they a racist, extremist group that hates whites, Christians and America? Am I mistaken?

“No” and “yes,” in that order.

Feel free to cite any actual evidence to the contrary, certainly, via verifiable online links.

“”””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””’’’

I appreciate you taking the time to respond. And your idea of cites is a good one..

If you have any information that shows the JADL is equitable in it’s treatment of all Americans that would be great. Any examples where they have consistently argued for the rights of whites and Christians would be much appreciated .

I am just trying to correct my perceptions or mis perceptions as the case may be.

I would appreciate any those cites you spoke of to support your points as I would really like to know..(that cite idea was good point of yours.)

Maybe it would help me understand why the JADLs was reputedly involved in that spying/intelligence gathering incident? Did they not do that? Also why they went from JADL to ADL...

Are they callously using minorities to bash whites for some hidden purpose?

Is this a situation where All Cows are Sacred only Some Cows are more Sacred than others?

You see I am not reflexively condemning anyone. I am also no longer willing to give one group or the other unexamined Carte Blanche especially on the basis of their support in the Main Stream Media as IMO they cannot be trusted.

W


71 posted on 11/17/2007 6:23:51 AM PST by WLR (Armed Staff on School Campus. Build the Fence, Iran delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: WLR
If you have any information

Nuh-uh. YOU'RE the one who raised the initial insinuation ("Aren’t they a racist, extremist group that hates whites, Christians and America?"; the assumptive "aren't they" at the beginning of said sentence plainly seeking to establish said assertion as an accepted "given," right from Jump Street.) in the first place. It's up to YOU, therefore, to either support your libel, or else withdraw it.

Neither my place nor my responsibility to attempt to "prove" a negative, obviously. The burden of proof lies with the claimant making the initial contested assertion.

Again: "Feel free to cite any actual evidence to the contrary, certainly, via verifiable online links."

72 posted on 11/17/2007 6:39:40 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson