Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WLR
If you have any information

Nuh-uh. YOU'RE the one who raised the initial insinuation ("Aren’t they a racist, extremist group that hates whites, Christians and America?"; the assumptive "aren't they" at the beginning of said sentence plainly seeking to establish said assertion as an accepted "given," right from Jump Street.) in the first place. It's up to YOU, therefore, to either support your libel, or else withdraw it.

Neither my place nor my responsibility to attempt to "prove" a negative, obviously. The burden of proof lies with the claimant making the initial contested assertion.

Again: "Feel free to cite any actual evidence to the contrary, certainly, via verifiable online links."

72 posted on 11/17/2007 6:39:40 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Caught Caught Caught lol

I made no insinuation, I have simply followed the time honored methods of the Main Stream Press.

I merely asked questions with regards to the Jewish Anti Defamation league.

The first of which was,

Aren’t they a racist, extremist group that hates Whites, Christians and America? Am I mistaken?

You answered definitively.

” “No” and “yes,” in that order. “

You are the only one who made an assertion. Not I ...lol

Now, Is it your evasiveness or your inability to bring forth evidence supporting your assertion that brings potential legitimacy to the stated concerns? Perhaps it is both?

Is there something in the question, some point that JADL supporters like yourself are trying to suppress? To hide?

Considering you forth no defense. What should a reasonable person conclude?

Yes they are a Racist Group that hates Whites, Christians and America and no I was not mistaken?

That’s not clear,

Just because you put forth an intellectually vacuous defense does not mean definitively they are racists that hate Whites Christians and America..

They may be, but at this point the intellectually honest thing to do is to accept there is as of yet insufficient information on the table to make a definitive conclusion either way.

After all, aren’t we just looking for the truth here? :)

I must also be frank I am not comfortable using your inadequate defense to make any sort of definitive conclusion
myself.

It may be that a less flaccid defender could carry the day and support your position.

Slander?...lol

Look up the word... Slander or perhaps you mean libel are not at issue when one merely asks a question.

No matter how you howl and whine... your stuck.

Defend the JADL using cites and quotes (Your chosen standard) where they clearly are defending Whites and Christians, that would at least be something.
Or the question still remains..

Troublesome and Disturbing..lol

Isn’t that how the Main Stream Press that featured the JADLs assertions puts it so often?

Could the JADL be the Pot Calling the Kettle Black?

“Inquiring minds want to know” rotflol

Now Fish or Cut Bait

W

Like I said before if the JDL had something to say about this issue I would consider their words. Meir Kahane was a man worthy of respect.

As far as the JADL... I will repeat.. Who are they?


74 posted on 11/17/2007 10:40:36 AM PST by WLR (Defeating Liberalism and The East since 500 BC Iran delinda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson