Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI raids Liberty Dollar office-confiscates Ron Paul Dollars
http://www.rabidquill.com/ ^ | Nov 15, 2007 | "BJT"

Posted on 11/15/2007 7:50:21 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 641-653 next last
To: untrained skeptic

“If you haven’t noticed, the Constitution expressly gives the federal government the authority ‘To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin’.”

As I understad, its not congress who is coining money. Its a cartel of private banks. Congress gave up that authority in 1913. No?


541 posted on 11/15/2007 1:44:47 PM PST by usul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

“I have a few double eagles from the US Mint that have a ‘value’ of $50 on the coin. The 1 OZ gold vale, the real value, is almost $800. Is not the government selling me a coin with a government value value 1/16 of its actual value and is that not fraud?

What did you pay per coin for possession?

Depends, from $420 to $750 each. (depends on the time). What I am noting is that the government is selling the coins at their bullion value (and a bit) but only redeams them for 1/16 of their actual gold value. The government is only on the hook for a tiny fraction of the actual value of the coin if used in trade.

Look at it this way, say you buy a new car but the car comes with a legal statement that advises that the car can never be sold in the future for more than 1/16 of its current value. If the government tries another gold grab like the 1930’s, do you think they will reimburse owners at teh actual value (which would skyrocket) or at the fake value on the coin itself?


542 posted on 11/15/2007 1:45:42 PM PST by Jim Verdolini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: usul
Good one. Welcome to the Free Republic.


543 posted on 11/15/2007 1:49:32 PM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
OTOH, I could also see how they might take advantage of Ron Paul contribution efforts to make a little money on the side from such activity.

Yes, I can see how they could make a little money on the side too.

There's another thread on this. Liberty Dollar office raided (mod note: paper cites email as source). On it you'll learn that the $20 Ron Paul coin, which has less than $20 in metal, is now being sold on EBay for over $50.

Guess who's selling?

NORFED, the minter.

A profitable EMail

544 posted on 11/15/2007 1:49:59 PM PST by SJackson (every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, none to make him afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

“Now you are a list the FBI has somewhere. If the story is to be believed. :-)”

Oh, joy! And I tried for years to get off their **** e-mail list.


545 posted on 11/15/2007 1:54:19 PM PST by MrLee (Sha'alu Shalom Yerushalyim!! God bless Eretz Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
Well, since the government has the authority to do it, it's called regulating the value of the currency.

I think I understand the point you are making.

The point I am trying to make is that you can disagree with our government's monetary policy. You can lobby to change it.

However, you can't try and usurp the government's constitutionally granted authority and coin your own money, and try and undermine the government's regulation of the US dollar. That's insurrection.

I may not agree with what the government does with monetary policy, but I recognize that the Federal government has the authority to do it.

I do recognize that if we don't start showing some fiscal restraint, we are likely to remove ourselves from being the most powerful nation in the world economically. If that happens, the dollar's slide is going to continue for a long time, because the value of the dollar is based on the world's faith in our economy, and if we lose the number one spot, it's going to take a serious hit.

Fortunately for us, the economies of the world are so intertwined through trade that if we take a big hit, pretty much everyone else does as well, which has helped keep us on top despite our own foolishness.

546 posted on 11/15/2007 1:57:15 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Two words—Gresham’s Law. This whole thing begs the question of whether the promoters of this “money” are accepting worthless federal reserve notes in exchange for their valuable liberty dollars. If so, something just ain’t right.


547 posted on 11/15/2007 1:58:51 PM PST by Busywhiskers (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
However, you can't try and usurp the government's constitutionally granted authority and coin your own money, and try and undermine the government's regulation of the US dollar. That's insurrection.

None of which was happening here. There have been disclaimers left right and upside down six ways from Sunday that Liberty Dollars are NOT "legal tender," "money," "current money," "coin," and so on.

If I accept a new plasma TV set, or an couple of bars of gold, instead of $2,000 in federal reserve notes for the motorcycle I just sold on eBay, I'm not trying to undermine the government's regulation of the US dollar, I'm engaging in barter with a willing partner in the transaction.

If you haven't noticed lately, we have already lost the world's faith in our economy with our out-of-control federal spending and the blinding speed of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing's presses.

A "dollar" used to be a specified weight of gold or silver, when this country was founded. Twenty "dollars" was about an ounce of gold. The slide of the dollar has been going on for nearly a century, what makes you think it won't continue?

548 posted on 11/15/2007 2:03:12 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
Telling people they cant trade in gold or press coins goes *way* beyond what the founders imagined.

You can trade in gold. Just don't coin your own currency out of it and try and regulate it's value.

There are likely a lot of things that the founders didn't imagine. However, it sure seems that they imagined that it would be bad is the federal government couldn't regulate currency and every state, municipality, and person could just create whatever currency they wanted and try and get everyone else to use it.

That's why one of the rather limited list of powers they gave to the Federal government was the ability to regulate our currency.

If you want to go after folks undermining our currecny how about starting at walmart

Oh yes. The EVIL Wal-Mart that does such horrible things as offering to sell people goods at inexpensive prices, and tracking what sells well enough to realize that they buy USA program they tried wasn't gaining traction with their customers who let the more expensive American products sit on the shelves and bought foreign products instead. So they dropped products that were taking up shelf space and costing them money.

The still do sell American products that are available at a competitive price, but they can't make people buy American products, and they aren't going to force their customers to go somewhere else to buy things at lower prices.

Wal-Mart's efficiency has also done a lot to keep prices low for consumers, which has kept our standard of living high, and they make a rather sizable contribution to our GDP, so I think your accusation isn't exactly based in reality.

549 posted on 11/15/2007 2:15:31 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
mvpel mentioned a guy that paid his employees with uncirculated coins using their face value to underrepresent how much he was paying them and reduce how much taxes had to be paid. The IRS is apparently quite unhappy with him.
550 posted on 11/15/2007 2:18:33 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: Jim Verdolini
Those are uncirculated coins that are meant for collectors. They don't want to mint them with a face value that might somehow be worth more than what they are selling them for as collector's items because they would then get people turning them back in for cash. Therefore the face value will always be lower than the value of the gold, and obviously lower than the price they charge for them.

It's not fraud because they make no secret of the fact that you are paying far more for the coin than it's face value.

551 posted on 11/15/2007 2:24:40 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
My Ron Paul money is no good!

Thank G-d I still have my solid gold Judicial Watch badge! That's real!

552 posted on 11/15/2007 2:30:53 PM PST by isthisnickcool (Judy Ruliani - Could our next president be a drag....queen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usul
As I understad, its not congress who is coining money. Its a cartel of private banks. Congress gave up that authority in 1913. No? No. Congress didn't give up that authority. The do allow private banks to control the money supply under their authority, but they can withdraw that permission the same way they granted it, through legislation.
553 posted on 11/15/2007 2:31:34 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

“Those are uncirculated coins that are meant for collectors. They don’t want to mint them with a face value that might somehow be worth more than what they are selling them for as collector’s items because they would then get people turning them back in for cash. Therefore the face value will always be lower than the value of the gold, and obviously lower than the price they charge for them.

It’s not fraud because they make no secret of the fact that you are paying far more for the coin than it’s face value.”

Then why put a face value on them at all? Krugerands don’t. I suspect teh idea is that, in the event of government theft, the face value in worthless paper would be the reimbursement value? That is what they did in the 1930’s.


554 posted on 11/15/2007 2:35:33 PM PST by Jim Verdolini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
None of which was happening here. There have been disclaimers left right and upside down six ways from Sunday that Liberty Dollars are NOT "legal tender," "money," "current money," "coin," and so on.

The tell people that it is legal, functional currency.

The tell people that to use it like legal tender.

They call the legal tender fake money, and tell everyone to use theirs instead.

After all that they put in the disclaimer that their money isn't legal tender.

They are pretty obviously saying that you should use it as legal tender, but they can't call it that because they would get in trouble.

That's like robbing a bank and assuring everyone the whole time that it isn't a robbery, you are just borrowing the money.

If I accept a new plasma TV set, or an couple of bars of gold, instead of $2,000 in federal reserve notes for the motorcycle I just sold on eBay, I'm not trying to undermine the government's regulation of the US dollar, I'm engaging in barter with a willing partner in the transaction.

I agree. I see nothing wrong with doing that.

f you haven't noticed lately, we have already lost the world's faith in our economy with our out-of-control federal spending and the blinding speed of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing's presses.

We haven't lost the world's faith in our economy, but that faith is weakening. Our prominence is fading.

A "dollar" used to be a specified weight of gold or silver, when this country was founded. Twenty "dollars" was about an ounce of gold. The slide of the dollar has been going on for nearly a century, what makes you think it won't continue?

I never said it won't continue to slowly slide. Our monetary policy is designed to limit inflation to a very low level, but not completely erase it.

The government doesn't aim for zero inflation either. They aim for very low inflation, but they do consider a tiny amount of inflation desirable. Our government is intentionally discouraging people from sticking money away in mattresses. They want to encourage people to invest their money to stimulate growth. That's pretty much stated policy, it isn't a secret.

555 posted on 11/15/2007 2:49:33 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: Jim Verdolini
Then why put a face value on them at all? Krugerands don’t. I suspect teh idea is that, in the event of government theft, the face value in worthless paper would be the reimbursement value? That is what they did in the 1930’s.

I expect it have more to do with them having a higher perceived value to collectors if they are actually considered US currency even though they are uncirculated. They probably just stick a value on them because they can sell them for more that way.

556 posted on 11/15/2007 2:52:26 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: MarkL; VRWCmember

No not referring to the mexican paso. LOL.

Some downtown establishments in Austin have accept a script/currency to exchange for goods and it’s like using regular cash. Similar to the BerkShares. http://www.berkshares.org/localcurrency.htm#whatare


557 posted on 11/15/2007 3:15:35 PM PST by rineaux (How dare you, how dare you question the Clinton's wrecked record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

As I understand it, the paper bills are/were backed by silver and gold stored in a warehouse, which I presume is the one that got raided. As far as the actual reason for the raid, I wonder if it’s simply because the money was being created without a federal license. In the Berkshares link above, it quickly became clear that the town needed a license from the federal government to make its own money. This raid may have nothing to due with the Liberty Dollar being an actual currency of value (backed by silver and gold).


558 posted on 11/15/2007 3:22:31 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rineaux
No not referring to the mexican paso. LOL.

I figured that out after reading a little further. Of course with the outrage that some people expressed over a private business (Pizza Patron) making a business decision to accept Mexican pesos as payment from its customers who preferred to pay that way (at exchange rates extremely beneficial to PP I'm sure), I just assumed there was an immigration angle to the "alternate currency".

559 posted on 11/15/2007 3:54:14 PM PST by VRWCmember (Fred Thompson 2008! Taking America Back for Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

It was my thought that this guy might not have the reserves he claimed.


560 posted on 11/15/2007 4:03:48 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 641-653 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson