So, in your view, unalienable God-given rights can be alienated by majority vote?
No, that’s not my view. My view is that abortion is indefensible, and if abortionists were put where they had to defend it, they would lose, and their party would suffer horribly.
Having abortion decided in the courts the way it has been since 1973 has hampered the debate. Abortionists have had their way without having to defend death, so they haven’t paid the cost that their view would most definitely cost them. If R v W were overturned, the matter would go back to the polititians. If they wanted to kill babies, they would have to defend it. IMO after a while, abortion would become so repugnant, it would be easy to amend the constitution to outlaw it if that was needed. But also IMO it wouldn’t be needed. Current laws against killing innocent human beings would be interpreted in favor of the unborn just as surely as they apply to those who have been born.