Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

No, that’s not my view. My view is that abortion is indefensible, and if abortionists were put where they had to defend it, they would lose, and their party would suffer horribly.

Having abortion decided in the courts the way it has been since 1973 has hampered the debate. Abortionists have had their way without having to defend death, so they haven’t paid the cost that their view would most definitely cost them. If R v W were overturned, the matter would go back to the polititians. If they wanted to kill babies, they would have to defend it. IMO after a while, abortion would become so repugnant, it would be easy to amend the constitution to outlaw it if that was needed. But also IMO it wouldn’t be needed. Current laws against killing innocent human beings would be interpreted in favor of the unborn just as surely as they apply to those who have been born.


44 posted on 11/14/2007 5:20:13 PM PST by HoustonTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: HoustonTech

Totally agree RvW has got to be taken out of the courts and let the American public decide once and for all where we stand. IMO Abortion would be a no longer be a campaign issue.


48 posted on 11/14/2007 8:20:58 PM PST by Bailee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson